PL EN
PRACA POGLĄDOWA
Reakcja Unii Europejskiej na COVID-19 jako wypełnienie braków w konstrukcji Europejskiej Unii Gospodarczej i Walutowej
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Mateusz Szczurek   

Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Długa 44/50, 00-241, Warszawa, Polska
Data nadesłania: 10-03-2021
Data ostatniej rewizji: 27-05-2021
Data akceptacji: 21-10-2021
Data publikacji: 28-12-2021
 
GNPJE 2021;308(4):83–102
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
KODY KLASYFIKACJI JEL
STRESZCZENIE
Europejski Instrument na rzecz Odbudowy i Zwiększania Odporności (RRF) wraz z instrumentem tymczasowego wsparcia w celu zmniejszenia zagrożeń związanych z bezrobociem w sytuacji nadzwyczajnej (SURE) stanowią znaczącą próbę wypełnienia istotnej luki w konstrukcji Europejskiej Unii Gospodarczej i Walutowej (EUGiW). Artykuł pokazuje znaczenie i potrzebę wspólnego mechanizmu fiskalnego dla funkcjonowania EUGiW oraz wskazuje, dlaczego trudne będzie odejście od tymczasowości zaproponowanych elementów. Problemy te czynią implementację RRF istotną nie tylko dla odbudowy gospodarki po pandemii COVID-19, ale także dla dalszej stabilności strefy euro i Unii Europejskiej (UE). Porażka wdrożenia RRF oznaczać będzie konieczność utrzymywania bardziej konserwatywnej polityki fiskalnej w czasach koniunktury, gdyż to krajowa polityka fiskalna pozostanie kluczowym elementem zastępującym ograniczoną rolę unijnych mechanizmów stabilnościowych przy wstrząsach asymetrycznych.
 
REFERENCJE (76)
1.
Alcidi C., D’Imperio P., Thirion G. [2017], Risk-sharing and Consumption-smoothing Patterns in the US and the Euro Area: A comprehensive comparison, CEPS Working Document, 4, May.
 
2.
Atoyan R., Christiansen L., Dizioli A., Ebeke C., Ilahi N., Ilyina A., Zakharova D. [2016], Emigration and Its Economic Impact on Eastern Europe, IMF Staff Discussion Note, 16 (7): 1.
 
3.
Auerbach A., Gorodnichenko Y. [2012], Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4 (2): 1–27.
 
4.
Avgouleas E., Micossi S. [2021], On selling sovereigns held by the ECB to the ESM: institutional and economic policy implications, CEPS Policy Insights, March.
 
5.
Baglioni A., Boitani A., Bordignon M. [2016], Labor Mobility and Fiscal Policy in a Currency Union, FinanzArchiv., 72: 371–406, 10.1628/001522116X14739287071698.
 
6.
Bartsch E., Bénassy-Quéré A., Corsetti G., Debrun X. [2020], It’s All in the Mix: How Monetary and Fiscal Policies Can Work or Fail Together, Geneva Reports on the World Economy, 23, CEPR Press.
 
7.
Bayoumi T., Goldstein M., Woglom G. [1995], Do Credit Markets Discipline Sovereign Borrowers? Evidence From the U. S., Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27 (4): 1046–1059.
 
8.
Beblavý M., Lenaerts K., Maselli I. [2017], Design of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme, CEPS Research Report, 4, February.
 
9.
Beetsma R. M. [1999], Does Monetary Unification Lead to Excessive Debt Accumulation, Journal of Public Economics, 74 (3): 299–325.
 
10.
Beetsma R., Cima S., Cimadomo J. [2018], A minimal moral hazard central stabilisation capacity for the EMU based on world trade, Working Paper Series, 2137, ECB, March.
 
11.
Beetsma R., Burgoon B., Nicoli F., de Ruijter A., Vandenbroucke F. [2020], What kind of EU fiscal capacity? Evidence from a randomized survey experiment in five European countries in times of corona, CEPR Discussion Paper, 15094, 24 July.
 
12.
Bénassy-Quéré A., Wolff G. [2020], How has the macro-economic imbalances procedure worked in practice to improve the resilience of the euro area?, European Parliament, doi: 10.2861/140579.
 
13.
Bénassy-Quéré A., Brunnermeier M., Enderlein H., Farhi E., Fratzscher M., Fuest C., Gourinchas P-O., Martin P., Pisani-Ferry J., Rey H., Schnabel I., Véron N., Weder di Mauro B., Zettelmeyer J. [2018], Reconciling risk sharing with market discipline: A constructive approach to euro area reform, CEPR Policy Insigh, 91.
 
14.
Béranger A., Scialom L. [2015]. Banking Union: Mind the Gaps, International Economics, 144, 10.1016/j.inteco.2015.08.001.
 
15.
Berger H., Dell’Ariccia G., Obstfeld M. [2018]. Revisiting the Economic Case for Fiscal Union in the Euro Area, IMF Departmental Papers / Policy Papers.
 
16.
Beyer R. C. M., Smets F. [2015], Labour market adjustments and migration in Europe and the United States: how different?, Economic Policy, 30 (84): 643–682.
 
17.
Blanchard O. [2007], Adjustment within the euro. The difficult case of Portugal, Port. Econ. J., 6: 1–21.
 
18.
Boonstra W. A. [2020], Creating a common safe asset without eurobonds, ECMI Policy Brief, 29.
 
19.
Brunnermeier M. K., Langfield S., Pagano M., Reis R., van Nieuwerburgh S., Vayanos D. [2017], ESBies: safety in the tranches, Economic Policy, 32 (90): 175–219, https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic....
 
20.
Brunnermeier M. K., Reis R. [2019], A Crash Course on the Euro Crisis Working Papers, https://scholar.princeton.edu/... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
21.
Bundesverfassungsgericht [2020], ECB decisions on the Public Sector Purchase Programme exceed EU competences, wyrok E 2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 980/16, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 1651/15, 5 maja.
 
22.
Buti M., Deroose S., Leandro J., Giudice G., Completing EMU, 13 July 2017, https://voxeu.org/article/comp... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
23.
Buti M., Giudice G., Leandro J. (eds.) [2020], Strengthening the Institutional Architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union, VoxEU.org eBook, CEPR Press.
 
24.
Commission of the European Communities [1977, April], The MacDougall Report – Volume I. Study group on the role of public finance in European integration, Brussels, Commission of the European Communities.
 
25.
Daily Express [2018, February 23], We won’t pay! EU budget nightmare as nations protest Brussels’ sky high spending, https://www.express.co.uk/news... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
26.
DeGrauwe P. [2011], The governance of a fragile Eurozone, CEPS Working Document, 346, May.
 
27.
De Groen W. P., Gros D. [2015], Estimating the Bridge Financing Needs of the Single Resolution Fund: How expensive is it to resolve a bank?, CEPS Special Report, 122.
 
28.
Delors J. [1989], Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community, Presented April 17, Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union.
 
29.
Delpla J., von Weizsäcker J. [2011], Eurobonds: The blue bond concept and its implications, Bruegel Policy Contribution, 21 March.
 
30.
EBC [2012, September 6], Technical features of Outright Monetary Transactions, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pres... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
31.
EBC [2016], Financial Integration in Europe, April.
 
32.
EBC [2018], Opinion of the European Central Bank on a proposal for a regulation on the establishment of a European Investment Stabilisation function, 9 listopada.
 
33.
EBC [2020], Economic Bulletin 6, Frankfurt: ECB, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
34.
EBC [2021], Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP), https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
35.
ECOFIN [2013], Statement of 18 December.
 
36.
Escolano J. [2010], A Practical Guide to Public Debt Dynamics, Fiscal Sustainability, and Cyclical Adjustment of Budgetary Aggregates, IMF Technical Notes And Manuals, 2: 1–25.
 
37.
ESM [2019], Safeguarding The Euro in Times of Crisis: The inside story of the ESM, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, doi: 10.2852/788601.
 
38.
ESM [2021, 03.05], ESM Members sign revised Treaty, entrusting the institution with new tasks, https://www.esm.europa.eu/pres... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
39.
Euronews [2021, 01.14]. Italy’s government plunged into crisis after junior coalition partner quits, https://www.euronews.com/2021/... (dostęp: 16/11/2021).
 
40.
European Commission [2002], Germany’s growth performancein the 1990’s, DG ECFIN Economic Papers, 170: 17–21.
 
41.
European Commission [2020], Economic Governance Review, COM (2020) 55 final.
 
42.
European Fiscal Board [2017], Assessment of the prospective fiscal stance appropriate for the euro area, Brussels, European Commission.
 
43.
European Fiscal Board [2018], Assessment of the fiscal stance appropriate for the euro area, Brussels, European Commission.
 
44.
European Fiscal Board [2019], Assessment of EU fiscal rules with a focus on the six and two-pack legislation, Brussels, European Commission.
 
45.
European Fiscal Board [2020], Annual Report of the European Fiscal Board, Brussels, European Commission.
 
46.
European Parliament [2021], European Desposit Insurance Scheme. Legislative Train Schedule, https://www.europarl.europa.eu... (edis) (dostęp: 28.04.2021).
 
47.
Financial Times [2011, 11.10], Slovakia votes against expanded EFSF.
 
48.
Financial Times [2020, 15.03], Christine Lagarde apologises for botched communication of ECB strategy.
 
49.
Gentiloni P. [2021], High Debt, Low Rates and Tail Events: Rules-Based Fiscal Frameworks under Stress, przemówienie podczas European Fiscal Board Annual Conference, https://ec.europa.eu/commissio... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
50.
In’t Veld J. [2016], Public Investment Stimulus in Surplus Countries and their Euro Area Spill Overs, European Economy – Economic Briefs (16).
 
51.
Juncker J.‑C., Tusk D., Dijsselbloem J., Draghi M., Schulz M. [2015], Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union, Brussels.
 
52.
Kenen P. [1969], The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View, w: Mundell R., Swoboda A. (eds.), Monetary Problems of the International Economy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
 
53.
Kawalec S., Pytlarczyk E. [2016], Paradoks euro: Jak wyjść z pułapki wspólnej waluty?, Ekonomicus, Warszawa.
 
54.
Komisja Europejska [2021a], EU Investor Presentation, https://ec.europa.eu/info/file... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
55.
Komisja Europejska [2021b], SURE, https://ec.europa.eu/info/busi... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
56.
Kunroo M. [2016], Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: A Literature Survey, Review of Market Integration, 7. 10.1177/0974929216631381.
 
57.
Lane P. R. [2021], The compass of monetary policy: favourable financing conditions, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pres... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
58.
Martin P., Ragot X. [2021], When and how to deactivate the SGP general escape clause?, EU Parliament In-depth Analysis series, PE 651.375, January, doi: 10.2861/46874.
 
59.
Messori M., Micossi S. [2018], Counterproductive Proposals on Euro Area Reform by French and German Economists, CEPS Papers.
 
60.
Micossi S. [2016], Balance-of-payments adjustment in the Eurozone, CEPS Policy Brief, 338, January.
 
61.
McKinnon R. I. [1963], Optimum currency areas, American Economic Review, 53 (4): 717–725.
 
62.
Mody A. [2018], Eurotragedy: A Drama in Nine Acts, Oxford University Press (US).
 
63.
Monti M. [2010], A New Strategy for the Single Market, Report to the President of the European Commission, May.
 
64.
Mundell R. A. [1961], A theory of optimum currency areas, The American Economic Review, 51 (4): 657–665.
 
65.
Pisani-Ferry J. [2018], Euro area reform: An anatomy of the debate, CEPR Policy Insight, 75.
 
66.
Regling K. [2018, 02.02], The role of the ESM in a deepening EMU, https://www.esm.europa.eu/spee... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
67.
Schnabel I. [2020], The shadow of fiscal dominance: Misconceptions, perceptions and perspectives, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pres... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
68.
Smolny W. [2009], Wage adjustment, competitiveness and unemployment – East Germany after unification, Journal of Economics and Statistics, April: 130–145.
 
69.
Szczurek M. [2017], Investing for Europe’s future, https://voxeu.org/article/inve... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
70.
Szczurek M. [2018], Euro Area Fiscal Stance And Its Operationalisation Perspective, w: W. R. Schmnitt-Nilson (ed.), Enhanced Fiscal Integration in the EMU? Proceedings of the joint workshop, organised by the European Commission, the European Stability Mechanism and the German Council of Economic Experts: 40–44, Brussels, DG Ecfin, doi: 10.2765/007960.
 
71.
Thygesen N. [2020], Why has a euro area treasury not yet taken shape, w: Strengthening the Institutional Architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union, Buti M., Giudice G., Leandro J. (eds.), CEPR Press, London.
 
72.
Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej (wersja skonsolidowana), Dziennik Urzędowy C326, 26/10/2012: 1–390.
 
73.
Trichet J-C. [2011], Introductory statement to the press conference, 7 kwietnia, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pres... (dostęp: 16.11.2021).
 
74.
Tumpel-Gugerell G. [2014], Expert Group on a Debt Redemption Fund and Eurobills, European Commission.
 
75.
Walters A. [1990], Sterling in Danger: The Economic Consequences of Pegged Exchange Rates, Fontana/Collins, London.
 
76.
Werner P. [1970], Report to the Council and the Commission on the realisation by stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community – Werner Report, Bulletin of the European Communities Supplement, 11.
 
eISSN:2300-5238