PL EN
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Warunki pracy w ramach globalnych łańcuchów wartości i rutynizacji na przykładzie pracowników z Polski
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
 
 
Data nadesłania: 10-03-2023
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 06-06-2023
 
 
Data akceptacji: 10-07-2023
 
 
Data publikacji: 29-09-2023
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz   

Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
 
 
GNPJE 2023;315(3):1-12
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
KODY KLASYFIKACJI JEL
F14
F16
 
STRESZCZENIE
Tematem artykułu jest zbadanie powiązań między globalnymi procesami fragmentacji produkcji (GVC), rutynizacją pracy a dobrostanem pracowników w Polsce. W szczególności skupiono się na wybranych miernikach warunków pracy, takich jak otoczenie społeczne, intensywność pracy i jakość czasu pracy, w celu zbadania ich zależności od zaangażowania w handel międzynarodowy i rutynizacji. Połączone zostały indywidualne dane opisujące warunki pracy i dobrostan pracowników z danymi sektorowymi zawierającymi informacje o zaangażowaniu w globalne procesy produkcyjne. Wyniki wskazują na umiarkowany związek pomiędzy warunkami pracy a zaangażowaniem w GVC wśród polskich pracowników. W sektorach bardziej zależnych od GVC pracownicy otrzymują średnio niższe wynagrodzenie. Ponadto, związek między GVC a innymi aspektami warunków pracy jest statystycznie istotny, jednakże w ujęciu ekonomicznym ma wymiar marginalny. Podobnie rutynizacja pracy jest ujemnie skorelowana z wynagrodzeniami i warunkami pracy (z wyjątkiem wskaźnika intensywności pracy). Najważniejszą zaletą przeprowadzonego badania jest wielowymiarowe podejście do analizy warunków pracy, co znacznie poszerza dotychczasowy stan wiedzy.
FINANSOWANIE
Źródło finansowania: grant Politechniki Gdańskiej (DEC-3/2022/IDUB/IV.2/EUROPIUM) w ramach programu EUROPIUM Short-Term Outgoing Visits - "Inicjatywa Doskonałości – Uczelnia Badawcza".
 
REFERENCJE (34)
1.
Acemoglu D., Autor D. [2011], Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings, in: Handbook of Labor Economics: 1043–1171.
 
2.
Aleksynska M. [2018], Temporary employment, work quality, and job satisfaction, Journal of Comparative Economics, 46 (3): 722–735, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.....
 
3.
Autor D. H., Dorn D. [2013], The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market, American Economic Review, 103 (5): 1553–1597, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10....
 
4.
Autor D. H., Levy F., Murnane R. J. [2003], The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (4): 1279–1333, https://doi.org10.1162/0033553....
 
5.
Barrientos S., Gereffi G., Rossi A. [2011], Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world, International Labour Review, 150 (3–4): 319–340, https://doi.org10.1111/j.1564-....
 
6.
Barrientos S., Knorringa P., Evers B., Visser M., Opondo M. [2016], Shifting regional dynamics of global value chains: Implications for economic and social upgrading in African horticulture, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48 (7): 1266–1283, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0308....
 
7.
Baumgarten D. [2015], Offshoring the nature of tasks and occupational stability: empirical evidence for Germany, The World Economy, 38 (3): 479–508, https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.1....
 
8.
Baumgarten D., Geishecker I., Görg H. [2013], Offshoring tasks and skill-wage pattern, European Economic Review, 61: 132–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euro....
 
9.
Clark A. E., D’Ambrosio C., Zhu R. [2021], Job quality and workplace gender diversity in Europe, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 183: 420–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo....
 
10.
Das M., Hilgenstock B. [2022], The exposure to routinization: Labor market implications for developed and developing economies, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 60: 99–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stru....
 
11.
Ebenstein A., Harrison A., McMillan M., Phillips S. [2014], Estimating the impact of trade and offshoring on American workers using the current population surveys, Review of Economics and Statistics, 96 (4): 581–595.
 
12.
Eurofound [2017], Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview report (2017 update), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
 
13.
Eurofound [2020], Working conditions in sectors, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
 
14.
Eurofound [2021], Working conditions and sustainable work: An analysis of the job quality framework, Challenges and prospects in the EU series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
 
15.
Eurostat [2014], Structure of Earnings Survey 2014: Eurostat’s arrangements for implementing the Council Regulation 530/1999, Commission Regulation 1916/2000 and 1738/2005, European Commission, Brussels.
 
16.
Flecker J., Haidinger B., Schönauer A. [2013], Divide and serve: The labour process in service value chains and networks, Competition & Change, 17 (1): 6–23, https://doi.org/10.1179/102452....
 
17.
Fonseca T., Lima F., Pereira S. C. [2018], Job polarization, technological change and routinization: Evidence for Portugal, Labour Economics, 51: 317–339.
 
18.
Frey C. B., Osborne M. A. [2017], The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological forecasting and social change, 114: 254–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
19.
Goos M., Manning A., Salomons A. [2014], Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring, American Economic Review, 104 (8): 2509–2526, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10....
 
20.
Kabeer N., Mahmud S. [2004], Globalization, gender, and poverty: Bangladeshi women workers in export and local markets, Journal of international development, 16 (1): 93–109, https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.10....
 
21.
Keister R., Lewandowski P. [2017], A routine transition in the digital era? The rise of routine work in Central and Eastern Europe, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23 (3): 263–279, https://doi.org/10.1177/102425....
 
22.
Lee J., Gereffi G., Lee S. H. [2016], Social upgrading in mobile phone GVCs: firm-level comparisons of working conditions and labour rights, in: Nathan D., Tewari M., Sarkar S. (eds.), Labour in Global Value Chains in Asia: 315–352, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
23.
Lewandowski P., Park A., Hardy W., Du Y. [2019], Technology, Skills, and Globalization: Explaining International Differences in Routine and Nonroutine Work Using Survey Data, IZA Discussion Paper No. 12339, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3390....
 
24.
Lund-Thomsen P., Nadvi K., Chan A., Khara N., Xue H. [2012], Labour in global value chains: Work conditions in football manufacturing in China, India and Pakistan, Development and Change, 43 (6): 1211–1237, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
25.
Nikulin D., Wolszczak-Derlacz J., Parteka A. [2022], Working Conditions in Global Value Chains: Evidence for European Employees, Work, Employment and Society, 36 (4): 701–721, https://doi.org/10.1177/095001....
 
26.
Papke L. E., Wooldridge J. M. [1996], Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rate, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11: 619–632.
 
27.
Parteka A. [2018], Import intensity of production, tasks and wages: Micro-level evidence for Poland, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6 (2): 71–89.
 
28.
Parteka A., Wolszczak-Derlacz J. [2015], Integrated sectors diversified earnings: (missing) impact of offshoring on wages and wage convergence in the EU27, The Journal of Economic Inequality, 13 (3): 325–350, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888....
 
29.
Pawlicki P. [2013], Control in an Internationalized Labour Process: Engineering Work in Global Design Networks, Competition & Change, 17 (1): 41–56, https://doi.org/10.1179/102452....
 
30.
Piasna A. [2018], Scheduled to work hard: The relationship between non-standard working hours and work intensity among European workers (2005–2015), Human Resource Management Journal, 28 (1): 167–181, https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8....
 
31.
Plank L., Rossi A., Staritz C. [2012], Workers and social upgrading in “fast fashion”: The case of the apparel industry in Morocco and Romania, ÖFSE Working Paper No. 33.
 
32.
Rossi A. [2013], Does economic upgrading lead to social upgrading in global production networks? Evidence from Morocco, World Development, 46: 223–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worl....
 
33.
Wang Z., Wei S.-Z., Zhu K. [2013], Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels, NBER Working Paper No. 19677.
 
34.
Wooldridge J. M. [2010], Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top