PL EN
 
PL EN
Bieżący numer
Numery archiwalne
O czasopiśmie
Dla autorów
Kontakt
2/2023 vol. 314
Statystyki
CC-BY 4.0
Pobierz cytowanie
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Instytucja kapitału społecznego a rozwój gospodarczy: model PLS-SEM
Mateusz Borkowski 1
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, University of Bialystok, Poland
 
 
Data nadesłania: 15-11-2022
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 10-02-2023
 
 
Data akceptacji: 04-04-2023
 
 
Data publikacji: 30-06-2023
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Mateusz Borkowski   

Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, University of Bialystok, Poland
 
 
GNPJE 2023;314(2):11-27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/163005
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Pliki dodatkowe
Referencje (83)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
kapitał społeczny
PLS-SEM
instytucje
rozwój gospodarczy
 
KODY KLASYFIKACJI JEL
C31
C50
O11
O43
Z13
 
STRESZCZENIE
Celem artykułu jest pomiar kapitału społecznego oraz określenie jego oddziaływania na rozwój gospodarczy wybranych gospodarek europejskich w latach 2017–2020. W pracy wykorzystano metodę modelowania równań strukturalnych z wykorzystaniem cząstkowych najmniejszych kwadratów (PLS-SEM), która umożliwia pomiar oraz identyfikację związków pomiędzy zmiennymi ukrytymi (bezpośrednio nieobserwowalnymi). Ustalono, że zaufanie społeczne jest bardziej determinowane przez zaufanie interpersonalne niż przez zaufanie względem organizacji. Ponadto stwierdzono, że zaufanie społeczne jest najważniejszym elementem ogólnej miary kapitału społecznego. Mniej ważnym w formowaniu tej zmiennej okazała się zmienna społecznych interakcji i postaw. Ustalono także, że pomiędzy zmiennymi kapitału społecznego i rozwoju gospodarczego występuje silny dodatni i istotny statystycznie związek.
 
REFERENCJE (83)
1.
Acemoglu D. [2009], Introduction to Modern Economic Growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Ali R., Naseem M. A., Farooq M. M. [2011], Social capital impact on economic development (a theoretical perspective), International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 2 (4): 270–277.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Becker J. M., Klein K., Wetzels M. [2012], Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models, Long Range Planning, 45 (5–6): 359–394.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Beugelsdijk S., Groot H. L. F. de, Schaik A. B. T. M. van [2004], Trust and Economic Growth: A Robustness Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers, 56 (1): 118–134.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Bloch H., Tang S. H. K. [2004], Deep determinants of economic growth: Institutions, geography and openness to trade, Progress in Development Studies, 4 (3): 245–255.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Bowles S., Gintis H. [2002], Social Capital and Community Governance, The Economic Journal, 112 (483): F419–F436.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Cáceres-Carrasco F. R., Santos F. R., Guzmán C. [2019], Social capital, personal values and economic development: effect on innovation. An international analysis, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33 (1): 70–95.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Carrillo E., Romaní J. [2017], Measuring social capital: Further insights, Gaceta Sanitaria, 31 (1): 57–61.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Coleman J. S. [1988], Social capital in the creation of human capital, The American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Chavance B. [2008], Formal and Informal Institutional Change: The Experience of Postsocialist Transformation, European Journal of Comparative Economics, 5: 57–71.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Chin W. W. [2010], How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses, in: Esposito Vinzi V., Chin W. W., Henseler J., Wang H. (eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications: 655–690, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Ciborowski R. W., Skrodzka I. [2019], International Technology Transfer, Innovation and Economic Development of European Union Countries, European Research Studies Journal, XXII (3): 384–404.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Ciborowski R. W., Skrodzka I. [2020], International technology transfer and innovative changes adjustment in EU, Empirical Economics, 59 (3): 1351–1371.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Dash G., Paul J. [2021], CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173: 121092.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Dinda S. [2008], Social capital in the creation of human capital and economic growth: A productive consumption approach, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 2020–2033.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Engbers T. A., Thompson M. F., Slaper T. F. [2017], Theory and Measurement in Social Capital Research, Social Indicators Research, 132 (2): 537–558.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Escandon-Barbosa D., Urbano-Pulido D., Hurtado-Ayala A. [2019], Exploring the Relationship between Formal and Informal Institutions, Social Capital, and Entrepreneurial Activity in Developing and Developed Countries, Sustainability, 11 (2): 550.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Esposito Vinzi V., Trinchera L., Amato S. [2010], PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement, in: Esposito Vinzi V., Chin W. W., Henseler J., Wang H. (eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications: 47–82, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
EVS/WVS [2021], European Values Study and World Values Survey: Joint EVS/WVS 2017–2021 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS), JD Systems Institute & WVSA. Dataset Version 1.1.0.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Fafchamps M., Minten B. [2002], Returns to Social Network Capital among Traders, Oxford Economic Papers, 54 (2): 173–206.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Fedderke J., Kadt R. de, Luiz J. [1999], Economic Growth and Social Capital: A Critical Reflection, Theory and Society, 28 (5): 709–745.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Fiedor B. [2015], Instytucje formalne i nieformalne w kształtowaniu trwałego rozwoju, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ, 40: 83–107.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Francois P. [2003], Social Capital and Economic Development, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Fukuyama F. [1995], Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, The Free Press, New York–London–Toronto–Sydney–Tokyo–Singapore.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Gardocka A. [2005], Kultura ekonomiczna jako instytucja, in: Kopycińska D. (eds.), Teoretyczne Aspekty Gospodarowania: 229–239, Katedra Mikroekonomii Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Garson G. D. [2016], Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation Models, Statistical Associates Publishers, Asheboro.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Grafton R. Q., Knowles S., Owen P. D. [2004], Total Factor Productivity, Per Capita Income and Social Divergence, Economic Record, 80 (250): 302–313.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Gruszewska E. [2017], Instytucje formalne i nieformalne. Skutki antynomii, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 493: 36–50.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Haerpfer C., Inglehart R., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E., Puranen B. [2020], World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile, JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat, Madrid–Vienna.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Hair J. F., Hult G. T. M., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M. [2014], A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, SAGE, Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Singapore–Washington–Melbourne.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Hair J. F., Matthews L. M., Matthews R. L., Sarstedt M. [2017], PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use, IJMDA, 1 (2): 107–123.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Hair J. F., Risher J. J., Sarstedt M., Ringle C. M. [2019], When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, European Business Review, 31 (1): 2–24.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Henseler J., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M. [2015], A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1): 115–135.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Hodgson G. M. [2006], What Are Institutions?, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 1–25.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Jantoń-Drozdowska E., Majewska M. [2015], Social Capital as a Key Driver of Productivity Growth of the Economy: Across-Countries Comparison, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 10 (4): 61–83.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Kaasa A., Andriani L. [2022], Determinants of institutional trust: the role of cultural context, Journal of Institutional Economics, 18 (1): 45–65.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Knack S., Keefer P. [1997], Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4): 1251–1288.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Knowles S. [2005], Is social capital part of the institutions continuum?, CREDIT Research Paper, Working Paper No. 05/11.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Lee W. C., Law S. H. [2017], Roles of Formal Institutions and Social Capital in Innovation Activities: A Cross-Country Analysis, Global Economic Review, 46 (3): 203–231.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Lohmöller J. B. [1989], Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Springer, Berlin.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk B. [2012], Mierzenie kapitału społecznego, Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, 253 (1–2): 1–24.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Monecke A., Leisch F. [2012], semPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares, Journal of Statistical Software, 48 (3): 1–32.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Noonan R., Wold H. [1983], Evaluating school systems using partial least squares, Evaluation in Education, 7 (3): 219–364.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Nooteboom B. [2007], Social Capital, Institutions and Trust, Review of Social Economy, 65 (1): 29–53.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
North D. C. [1994], Economic Performance Through Time, The American Economic Review, 84 (3): 359–368.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Ostrom E. [1999], Social capital: A fad or a fundamental concept, in: Dasgupta P., Saregeldin I. (eds.), Social capital: a multifaceted perspective: 172–215, The World Bank, Washington D. C.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Ostrom E. [2008], Doing Institutional Analysis: Digging Deeper Than Markets and Hierarchies, in: Ménard C., Shirley M. M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics: 819–848, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Ostrom E., Ahn T. K. [2007], The Meaning of Social Capital and its Link to Collective Action, in: Svendsen G. T., Svendsen G. L. (eds.), Handbook on Social Capital, Edward Elgar, Indiana.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Owczarczuk M. [2020], Zmiany wybranych elementów kultury ekonomicznej mieszkańców obszarów wiejskich w Polsce, in: Przygodzka R., Gruszewska E. (eds.), Instytucjonalne i strukturalne aspekty rozwoju rolnictwa i obszarów wiejskich. Księga poświęcona pamięci dr. hab. Adama Sadowskiego Profesora Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku: 77–91, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Białystok.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Portes A. [2000], The Two Meanings of Social Capital, Sociological Forum, 15: 1–12.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Portes A., Landolt P. [2000], Social Capital: Promise and Pitfalls of Its Role in Development, Journal of Latin American Studies, 32 (2): 529–547.
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Putnam R. D., Leonardi R., Nonetti R. Y. [1994], Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Rademaker M., Schuberth F. [2022], Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling, https://m-e-rademaker.github.i... (accessed on 11.11.2022).
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Rupasingha A., Goetz A. J., Freshwater D. [2000], Social Capital and Economic Growth: A County-Level Analysis, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32 (2): 565–572.
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Rezaei Z., Karimianpour G., Vahabi A., Latifi A., Amani M., Moradi M. [2020], Social capital and related factors in Western Iran students, Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 61 (1): E241–E245.
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Rodrik D. [2007], One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Rodrik D., Subramanian A., Trebbi F. [2004], Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development, Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (2): 131–165.
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Rogowski J. [1990], Modele miękkie. Teoria i zastosowanie w badaniach ekonomicznych, Wydawnictwo Filii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego w Białymstoku, Białystok.
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Sabatini F. [2008], Social Capital and the Quality of Economic Development, KYKLOS, 61 (3): 466–499.
Google Scholar
 
 
60.
Sarracino F., Mikucka M. [2017], Social Capital in Europe from 1990 to 2012: Trends and Convergence, Social Indicators Research, 131 (1): 407–432.
Google Scholar
 
 
61.
Sarstedt M., Hair J. F., Cheah J. H., Becker J. M., Ringle C. M. [2019], How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM, Australasian Marketing Journal, 27 (3): 197–211.
Google Scholar
 
 
62.
Saukani N., Ismail N. A. [2019], Identifying the Components of Social Capital by Categorical Principal Component Analysis, Social Indicators Research, 141 (2): 631–655.
Google Scholar
 
 
63.
Skrodzka I. [2016], Knowledge-Based Economy in the European Union: Cross-Country Analysis, Statistics in Transition, 17 (2): 281–294.
Google Scholar
 
 
64.
Staveren I. van [2003], Beyond Social Capital in Poverty Research, Journal of Economic Issues, 37 (2): 415–423.
Google Scholar
 
 
65.
Sztompka P. [1999], Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
 
 
66.
Sztompka P. [2007], Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
Google Scholar
 
 
67.
Tabellini G. [2010], Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the regions of Europe, Journal of the European Economic Association, 8 (4): 677–716.
Google Scholar
 
 
68.
Van Deth J. W. [2003], Measuring social capital: Orthodoxies and continuing controversies, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6 (1): 79–92.
Google Scholar
 
 
69.
Veblen T. B. [1924], Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of America, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Google Scholar
 
 
70.
Veblen T. B. [2016], The Theory of the Leisure Class, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Google Scholar
 
 
71.
Voigt S. [2012], How to Measure the Rule of Law, Kyklos, 65 (2): 262–284.
Google Scholar
 
 
72.
Voigt S. [2013], How (not) to measure institutions: a reply to Robinson and Shirley, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9 (1): 35–37.
Google Scholar
 
 
73.
Voigt S. [2018], How to measure informal institutions, Journal of Institutional Economics, 14 (1): 1–22.
Google Scholar
 
 
74.
Weaver R. [2018], Exploring the Elements of Social Capital: Leverage Points and Creative Measurement Strategies for Community Building and Program Evaluation, National Civic Review, 107 (1): 16–30.
Google Scholar
 
 
75.
Wetzels M., Odekerken-Schröder G., Oppen C. van [2009], Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration, MIS Quarterly, 33 (1): 177–195.
Google Scholar
 
 
76.
Whiteley P. F. [2000], Economic Growth and Social Capital, Political Studies, 48: 443–466.
Google Scholar
 
 
77.
Wilkin J. [2016], Instytucjonalne i kulturowe podstawy gospodarowania, Scholar, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
 
 
78.
Wilson B., Henseler J. [2007], Modeling Reflective Higher-Order Constructs using Three Approaches with PLS Path Modeling: A Monte Carlo Comparison, in: Thyne M., Deans K. R. (eds.), ANZMAC 2007: Conference proceedings and refereed papers: 791–800, ANZMAC.
Google Scholar
 
 
79.
Wirth S., Markard J., Truffer B., Rohracher H. [2013], Informal institutions matter: professional culture and the development of biogas technology, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8: 20–41.
Google Scholar
 
 
80.
Wold H. [1980], Soft modelling: intermediate between traditional model building and data analysis, Banach Center Publications, 6 (1): 333–346.
Google Scholar
 
 
81.
Wold H. [1982], Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions, in: Joreskog K. G., Wold H. (eds.), Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction: 1–54, Amsterdam–New York–Oxford.
Google Scholar
 
 
82.
Woolcock M. [1998], Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework, Theory and Society, 27: 151–208.
Google Scholar
 
 
83.
Yaghoubi N. M., Kaseb M. Z., Sayedalhosseini S. M., Moloudi J., Nori H. [2016], Planning and Development: Social Capital and Promoting Mental Health, Modern Applied Science, 10 (12): 146.
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
Dlaczego reżimy rodzą się i trwają? Białoruś a teoria Acemoglu i Robinsona
Czy wzrost gospodarczy i wyższe wydatki na wojsko są możliwe jednocześnie? Perspektywa endogeniczności
Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne w gospodarce Indii
Skarbowość w ujęciu instytucjonalnej teorii kontraktów
Mierzenie kapitału społecznego
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks kodów klasyfikacji JEL
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
System opracowano w ramach zadania:
"Digitalizacja czasopisma Gospodarka Narodowa", sfinansowanego ze środków Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę, w ramach umowy nr 555/P-DUN/2018.

© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top