PL EN
PRACA ORYGINALNA
O wykorzystaniu modeli w myśli ekonomicznej Adama Smitha
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, Poland
 
 
Data nadesłania: 20-04-2022
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 29-07-2022
 
 
Data akceptacji: 04-01-2023
 
 
Data publikacji: 31-03-2023
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Łukasz Hardt   

Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, Poland
 
 
GNPJE 2023;313(1):3-18
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
KODY KLASYFIKACJI JEL
STRESZCZENIE
Wiele napisano o ekonomii Adama Smitha, jednakże to, czy jego metoda badawcza może być określona jako wyjaśnianie poprzez modelowanie, jest w dużej mierze nadal niezbadane. Interesujące jest więc przeanalizowanie tego, w jakim stopniu A. Smith może być uznany za budującego modele. Kwestia ta podejmowana jest w niniejszym tekście. Analizując elementy metody wyjaśniania poprzez modelowanie obecne u tych, którzy wywarli wpływ na Smitha, ale też badając jego własną metodę badawczą, wraz z odniesieniem się do jego generalnej refleksji nad tym, jak nauka, w tym ekonomia, powinna być uprawiana, pokazujemy, że jego metoda badawcza w dużej mierze opiera się na modelowaniu zjawisk empirycznych.
 
REFERENCJE (70)
1.
Ahmad S. [1990], Adam Smith’s Four Invisible Hands, History of Political Economy, 22 (1): 137–144.
 
2.
Alexandrova A. [2006], Connecting Economic Models to the Real World: Game Theory and the FCC Spectrum Auctions, Phi¬losophy of the Social Sciences, 36 (2): 173–192.
 
3.
Aspromourgos T. [2012], The Machine in Adam Smith’s Economic and Wider Thought, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34 (4): 475–490.
 
4.
Aydinonat N. E. [2008], The Invisible Hand in Economics: How Economists Explain Unintended Social Consequences, Routledge, London.
 
5.
Aydinonat N. E., Köksal E. [2019], Explanatory Value in Context: The Curious Case of Hotelling’s Location Model, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26 (5): 879–910.
 
6.
Berry Ch. [2012], Adam Smith’s Science of Human Nature, History of Political Economy, 44 (3), 471–492.
 
7.
Berry Ch., Paganelli M., Smith C. (eds.) [2013], The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
8.
Black M. [1962], Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
 
9.
Blaug M. [1980], The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
10.
Blaug M. [1990], Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
11.
Cantillon R. [2010/1755], An Essay on Economic Theory, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn.
 
12.
Cartwright N. [1983], How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, New York.
 
13.
Cartwright N. [1999], The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
14.
Charles L. [2003], The Visual History of the Tableau Économique, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 10 (4): 527–550.
 
15.
Condorcet M. de [1822/1794], Esquisse d’un Tableau Historique des Progrès de l’Esprit Humain, Chez Masson et Fils, Paris.
 
16.
Crombie A. [1994], Styles of Thinking in the European Tradition, Duckworth, London.
 
17.
Duke M. [1979], David Hume and Monetary Adjustment, History of Political Economy, 11: 572–587.
 
18.
Elmslie B. [2018], Adam Smith’s Discovery of Trade Gravity, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (2): 209–222.
 
19.
Frigg R. [2006], Models in Science, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/arc....
 
20.
Giere R. [1999], Science Without Laws, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
 
21.
Groenewegen P. [1977], Adam Smith and the Division of Labour. A Bicentenary Estimate, Australian Economic Papers, 16 (29): 161–174.
 
22.
Hausman D. [1992], The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
23.
Hardt Ł. [2016], On Similarities in Modelling and Metaphorizing Economic Phenomena, Methodological Studies, 36: 147–174.
 
24.
Hardt Ł. [2017], Economics Without Laws: Towards a New Philosophy of Economics, Palgrave, Cham.
 
25.
Harré R. [2001], Laws of Nature, in: Newton-Smith H. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Science: 213–224, Blackwell, Oxford.
 
26.
Henderson W. [2006], Evaluating Adam Smith: Creating the Wealth of Nations, Routledge, London–New York.
 
27.
Herzog L. [2013], Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
28.
Hume D. [1882/1758], Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, Longmans, Green, and Co., London.
 
29.
Hume D. [2000/1740], A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
30.
Jevons W. S. [1881], Cantillon and the Nationality of Political Economy, Contemporary Review, 39 (Jan./June).
 
31.
Khalil E. [2000], Making Sense of Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand: Beyond Pareto Optimality and Unintended Consequences, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (1): 49–63.
 
32.
Kuehn M. [2006], Knowledge and Belief, in: Haakonssen K. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy: 389–425, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
33.
Levy A. [2012], Models, Fictions, and Realism: Two Packages, Philosophy of Science, 79 (5): 738–748.
 
34.
Macfie A. [1971], The Invisible Hand of Jupiter, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32: 595–599.
 
35.
Mäki U. [1998], As If, in: Davis J. B., Hands D. W., Mäki U. (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Methodology: 25–27, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
 
36.
Mäki U. [2005], Models Are Experiments, Experiments Are Models, Journal of Economic Methodology, 12 (2): 303–315.
 
37.
Mäki U. [2009], Realistic Realism about Unrealistic Models, in: Kincaid H., Ross D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics: 68–98, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
38.
Marshall A. [1920], Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London.
 
39.
Mill J. S. [1843], A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, John W. Parker, London.
 
40.
Mill J. S. [2008/1836], On the Definition and Method of Political Economy, in: D. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics: 41–58, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
41.
Morgan M. [2012], The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
42.
Mróz R., Hardt Ł. [2020], Economic Modelling – Beyond Isolation and Construction: The Case of Austrian Business Cycle Theory as Presented by Roger Garrison, Acta Oeconomica, 70 (2): 251–273.
 
43.
Paganelli M. [2017], We Are Not the Center of the Universe: The Role of Astronomy in the Moral Defense of Commerce in Adam Smith, History of Political Economy, 49 (3): 451–468.
 
44.
Paganelli M. (ed.) [2020], The Routledge Guidebook to Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Routledge, London.
 
45.
Peaucelle J. [2006], Adam Smith’s Use of Multiple References for His Pin Making Example, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 13 (4): 489–512.
 
46.
Peaucelle J. [2012], Rhetoric and Logic in Smith’s Description of the Division of Labor, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19 (3): 385–408.
 
47.
Peaucelle J., Guthrie C. [2011], How Adam Smith Found Inspiration in French Texts on Pin Making in the Eighteenth Century, History of Economic Ideas, 19 (3): 41–67.
 
48.
Peil J. [1999], Adam Smith and Economic Sciences: A Methodological Reinterpretation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
 
49.
Phillipson N. [1989], David Hume: The Philosopher as Historian, Yale University Press, New Heaven.
 
50.
Popper K. [1972], Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
 
51.
Rasmussen D. [2017], The Infidel and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith and the Friendship that Shaped Modern Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
 
52.
Rothschild E. [2001], Economic Sentiments, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
53.
Samuelson P. [1977], A Modern Theorist’s Vindication of Adam Smith, The American Economic Review, 67 (1): 42–49.
 
54.
Samuelson P. [1980], A Corrected Version of Hume’s Equilibrating Mechanisms for International Trade, in: Chipman S., Kindle¬berger C. (eds.), Flexible Exchange Rates and the Balance of Payments: 141–158, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
 
55.
Schabas M. [2008], Hume’s Monetary Thought Experiments, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 39 (2): 161–169.
 
56.
Schliesser E. [2017], Adam Smith: Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
57.
Schumpeter J. [2006/1954], History of Economic Analysis, Routledge, London.
 
58.
Skinner A. [1974], Adam Smith: Science and the Role of the Imagination, in: Todd W. (ed.), Hume and the Enlightenment: 164–188, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
 
59.
Skinner A. [1996], A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
 
60.
Smith A. [1980/1795], Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
61.
Smith A. [1983/1763], Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, in: Bryce J. C. (ed.), Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
62.
Smith A. [1993/1776], An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
 
63.
Smith A. [2004/1759], Theory of Moral Sentiments, Barnes & Noble Books, New York.
 
64.
Smith V. [2019], Adam Smith: Scientist and Evolutionist, https://www.adamsmithworks.org... (accessed on: 1.06.2022).
 
65.
Smith V., Wilson B. [2019], Humanomics: Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge Uni¬versity Press, Cambridge.
 
66.
Sugden R. [2000], Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, 7 (1): 1–31.
 
67.
Sugden R. [2013], How Fictional Accounts Can Explain, Journal of Economic Methodology, 20 (3): 237–243.
 
68.
Tobin J. [1985], Theoretical Issues in Macroeconomics, in: Feiwel G. (ed,), Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution: 103–133, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
 
69.
Weingast B. [2018], Reconstructing Adam Smith’s Politics, unpublished manuscript.
 
70.
Weisberg M. [2007], Three Kinds of Idealization, Journal of Philosophy, 104 (12): 639–659.
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top