PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Why Do Regimes Arise and Persist? Belarus and the Theory of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of History of Economics, University of Lodz, Poland
 
2
Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2023-07-11
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-12-12
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-01-07
 
 
Publication date: 2024-03-28
 
 
Corresponding author
Andrzej Pieczewski   

Department of History of Economics, University of Lodz, Poland
 
 
GNPJE 2024;317(1):19-33
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
The Eastern European state of Belarus, a former Soviet republic, is classified as a pure autocracy, and 2024 marks three decades since its strongman leader Alexander Lukashenko came to power. Over the years, Lukashenko has created a unique type of economy synergistic with the political system and known as “state capitalism.” In this paper, we refer to the theories of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson to explore the factors and institutions that facilitated Lukashenko’s rise to power and ensure the durability of the Belarusian authoritarian system. We found that the case of Belarus is unique and holds relevance for post-Soviet studies, deviating in some respects from Acemoglu and Robinson’s theory, especially regarding the dictator’s ascent to power and the factors sustaining the system. We hypothesise that culture and mental models were crucial for Lukashenko to take power, while the system’s persistence is, in large part, due to the dictator’s external protector, Russia. We use historical analysis and evaluate economic and institutional development indicators.
FUNDING
This article is based on research funded by Poland’s National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) under the scientific project “Belarus and Poland: From the Historical Roots of Political and Economic Systems to Institutional Planning for Development” (Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju, No. SzN/I/39/BaP/2022).
REFERENCES (58)
1.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. [2008], Persistence of Power, Elites and Institutions, American Economic Review, 98 (1): 267–293.
 
2.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. [2012], Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, Profile Books, London.
 
3.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. [2013], Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (2): 172–193.
 
4.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. [2019], The Narrow Corridor. States, Societies and the Fate of Liberty, Penguin Press.
 
5.
Acton E. [2013], Rosja. Dziedzictwo caratu i władzy radzieckiej, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa.
 
6.
Antoszewski A., Herbut R. [2001], Systemy polityczne współczesnego świata, Wydawnictwo Arche, Gdańsk.
 
7.
Åslund A. [2013], How Capitalism Was Built. The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, Cambridge University Press, New York.
 
8.
Bartlett R. [2010], Historia Rosji, Wydawnictwo Bellona, Warszawa.
 
9.
Brzeziecki A., Nocuń M. [2021], Łukaszenka. Niedoszły car Rosji, Wydawnictwo Czarne, Wołowiec.
 
10.
Chwalba A. [2006], Imperium korupcji w Rosji i Królestwie Polskim w latach 1861–1917, Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków.
 
11.
Denzau A., North D. C. [1994], Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions, Kyklos, 1.
 
12.
Eberhardt A. [2008], Gra pozorów. Stosunki rosyjsko-białoruskie 1991–2008, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Warszawa.
 
13.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development [1995], Transition Report 1994, https://www.ebrd.com/publicati.... (accessed on 11.05.2023).
 
14.
Foligowski P. [1999], Białoruś – trudna niepodległość, Wydawnictwo Alta2, Wrocław.
 
15.
Frear M. [2019], Belarus under Lukashenka. Adaptive Authoritarianism, Routledge, London–New York.
 
16.
Geert Hofstede [2022], https://hi.hofstede-insights.c... (accessed on 25.04.2023).
 
17.
Gerschenkron A. [1966], Agrarian Policies and Industrialization: Russia 1861–1917, in: Habakkuk H. J., Postan M. M., The Cambridge Economic History of Europe. The Industrial Revolutions and After: Incomes, Population and Technological Change, vol. 6, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
18.
Heritage Foundation, Heritage Report [2022], https://www.heritage.org/index... (accessed on 16.05.2023).
 
19.
Heritage Foundation, Heritage Report [2022], Index of Economic Freedom 2022, Belarus, https://www.heritage.org/index... (accessed on 16.05.2023).
 
20.
Inglehart R.F. [2019], Cultural Evolution. People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
21.
Lenzi M. [2002], Lost Civilization: The Thorough Repression of Civil Society in Belarus, Demokratizatsiya, 14: 401–422.
 
22.
Myant M., Drahokoupil J. [2011], Transition economies. Political economy in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
 
23.
North D. C. [1990], Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Pressm Cambridge,.
 
24.
North D. C. [1995], The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development, in: Harriss J., Hunter J., Lewis C. M. (eds.), The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development (17–26), Routledge, London.
 
25.
North D. C. [2005], Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford.
 
26.
Ostrowski A. [2015], Rosja – wielkie zmyślenie. Od wolności Gorbaczowa do wojny Putina, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa.
 
27.
Pieczewski A., Sidarava A. [2022], Belarusian vs. Polish transformation. Two paths of constitutional change, UR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1 (22): 168–198, https://doi.org/10.15584/johas....
 
28.
Pipes R. [2009], Rosyjski konserwatyzm i jego krytycy. Studium kultury politycznej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
 
29.
Poczobut A. [2013], System Białoruś, Wydawnictwo Helion, Gliwice.
 
30.
Protko T. [1999], Problems of the Formation of a Civil Society in Belarus (1995–1999), Analytical Bulletin of the Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies, March.
 
31.
Reporters Without Borders [2021], Belarus: Bad time for independent journalism, https://rsf.org/en/belarus (accessed on 10.05.2023).
 
32.
Rosenbaum E. [2022], Mental models and institutional inertia, Journal of Institutional Economics: 18: 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1017/S17441....
 
33.
Sputnik Беларусь [2020], https://sputnik.by/20200623/Ne... (accessed on 10.07.2022).
 
34.
Szelényi I., Mihályi P. [2020], Varieties of Post-Communist Capitalism. A Comparative Analysis of Russia, Eastern Europe and China, Haymarket Books.
 
35.
Szybieka Z. [2002], Historia Białorusi 1795–2000, Instytut Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Lublin.
 
36.
The Global Economy, https://www.theglobaleconomy.c... (accessed on 11.05.2023).
 
37.
Transparency International [2022], Transparency International Report, https://www.transparency.org/e... (accessed on 16.05.2023).
 
38.
Williamson O. [2000], The new institutional economics. Taking stocks, looking ahead, Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3): 596–613.
 
39.
World Bank [2020], Doing Business Report, Belarus, https://www.doingbusiness.org/... (accessed on 16.05.2023).
 
40.
World Bank Database [2022], https://databank.worldbank.org... (accessed on 11.05.2023).
 
41.
Агентство Белта, March 11, [2013].
 
42.
Агенство Интерфакс, July 19, [2007].
 
43.
Astapenia R. [2016], Белорусско-российские отношения с перспективы Минска: формальный союз и фактическая дезинтеграция, Nowa Polityka Wschodnia, 2 (11): 43–56.
 
44.
Бабель [2021], https://babel.ua/ru/texts/6652... (accessed on 10.07.2022).
 
45.
Белстат: Малое и среднее предпринимательство в Республике Беларусь [2022], https://www.belstat.gov.by/ofi... (accessed on 19.01.2022).
 
46.
Белстат [2022], Промышленность в основных макроэкономических показателях Республики Беларусь в 2021 году, https://www.belstat.gov.by/upl... (accessed on 28.07.2022).
 
47.
Гортат Р. [2001], Система власти в Беларуси после референдума 1996 года, in: Антчака Р. (ed.), Белорусская экономика. От плана к рынку, Михала Гужиньского и Петра Козаржевского, vol. 1–2, CASE, Варшава.
 
48.
Доклад организации ‘Вясна’ Беларусь после выборов [2020], Минск, https://belhelcom.org/sites/de... (accessed on 8.05.2023).
 
49.
Карбалевич В. [2010], Александр Лукашенко:Политический портрет, Партизан, Минск.
 
50.
Князева С., Решетникова С. [2004], Основы идеологии белорусского государства, Акад упр. при Президенте, Минск.
 
51.
Леонов В. [2003], Работа над ошибками, Скиф, Смоленск.
 
52.
Медведев Р. [2010], Александр Лукашенко: контуры белорусской модели, BBPG, Москва.
 
53.
Олейник А. Н. [2002], Институциональная экономика: Учебное пособие, ИНФРА-М, Москва.
 
54.
Руденко Е. [2021], Демократия по материалам белорусских СМИ (середина 2020 начало 2021 года, Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury, 33: 39–48.
 
55.
Сельское хозяйство Республики Беларусь, Белстат [2021], https://www.belstat.gov.by/ofi... (accessed on 26.07.2022).
 
56.
Суздальцев А. [2014], Республика Беларусь: двадцать лет перехода к рынку, Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, 1 (121): 176–180.
 
57.
Титова Ю. [2020], Сколько Россия заплатила за дружбу с Лукашенко за последние 10 лет, Forbes, https://www.forbes.ru/finansy-... skolko-rossiya-zaplatila-za-druzhbu-s-lukashenko-za-poslednie-10 let (accessed on 21.05.2023).
 
58.
Чурманова К. [2021], Спасение соседа. Сколько теряет Россия на поддержке Беларуси, https://www.bbc.com/russian/fe... (accessed on 21.05.2023).
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top