PL EN
 
PL EN
Current Issue
Past Issues
About the Journal
For Authors
Contact Us

Peer-review Process

 
  • Articles are qualified for publication on the basis of a peer review process.
  • Articles are reviewed by at least two reviewers who are experts in the subject matter covered by the article and are not part of the journal’s editorial staff.
  • The review process is conducted according to a "double-blind" principle-neither the reviewer nor the author are aware of each other's identity.
  • The review process ensures that reviewers are independent of the authors, i.e. not affiliated with the same institution.
  • In the event of discrepancies in the evaluation of an article by two reviewers, the article is referred to a third reviewer for a conclusive review.
  • Reviews are in writing and contain a clear conclusion as to whether or not the article can be accepted for publication.
  • Articles are reviewed in accordance with uniform evaluation criteria adopted by the Editorial Board and set out in an article evaluation form.
  • Articles are evaluated on the basis of the following criteria:
    - suitability for a magazine of this type,
    - original content,
    - contribution of new insight into the subject of research,
    - factual accuracy.
  • Reviews form the basis of the Editorial Board's final decision on whether or not an article will be accepted for publication; on each occasion, such a decision is made after a discussion.
  • Editorial Board decisions end with one of the following conclusions:
    - The article is academically irreproachable and qualifies for publication.
    - The article requires some (minor) corrections and will qualify for publication once these are made.
    - The article requires significant (major) corrections and needs to be re-reviewed once these are made and before it can be qualified for publication.
    - The article does not qualify for publication.
  • If reservations are expressed with regard to an article, its authors are expected to take these into account in a new version of the article.
  • If the authors are unable to take the reservations into account, they should make a case in writing, explaining why.
  • If major reservations are expressed with regard to an article, the new version of the article will be re-reviewed by one of the reviewers who evaluated the original article.
 
List of reviewers



The journal is archived in
Open Access policy listed in
Email alerts
 
 
Sign up
Unsubscribe
Indexes
 
Keywords index
JEL Classification Codes index
Authors index
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
The system was developed as part of the task "Digitization of the journal Gospodarka Narodowa," financed under contract 555/P-DUN/2018 from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education funds allocated from the dissemination of science.

© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top