RESEARCH PAPER
The Sharing Economy and the Behaviour of Young Polish Singles: The Case of BlaBlaCar
More details
Hide details
1
Academic Unit for Economics, Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw, Poland
Submission date: 2020-06-11
Final revision date: 2020-09-25
Acceptance date: 2020-10-06
Publication date: 2020-12-30
Corresponding author
Tomasz Zalega
Academic Unit for Economics, Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw, Szturmowa 3, 02-678 Warsaw, Poland
GNPJE 2020;304(4):105-134
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
This article is a research exercise. The purpose of the study is to provide an insight into what young singles know about the sharing economy and what their key motives are for using the BlaBlaCar platform, the most popular sharing economy venture for passenger transport. In the theoretical part of the text, based on a critical analysis of the literature, the concept and essence of the sharing economy are explained, the BlaBlaCar transport service is characterised as a flagship example of the sharing economy, and an attempt is made to explain the terms “single” and “young single”. The empirical section focuses on the research conceptualisation and a description of the research sample and its characteristics. Subsequently, following the author’s own research, the knowledge of young singles about the sharing economy is analysed, and the most important motives encouraging them to use the BlaBlaCar platform are discussed. The analysis is based on a survey questionnaire administered from May 1 to July 30, 2018 in a sample of 826 young singles who made independent decisions in the market. The survey shows that young singles demonstrated fairly good knowledge of sharing economy ventures and the most popular car sharing websites. However, they are confused about the rich terminology associated with collaborative platforms and often misunderstand the sharing economy, identifying it with the access economy, gift economy or on-demand economy. BlaBlaCar is undoubtedly one of the most popular examples of the practical application of sharing economy fundamentals. The survey reveals that almost three-fifths of respondents use the BlaBlaCar platform. Its active participants are most often men in the 18–23 age group, with a bachelor’s or engineering degree, earning a monthly income not exceeding PLN 3,000, and living in cities with over 500,000 inhabitants. Lower travel costs, better travel conditions, the possibility of reaching a destination quickly and directly and environmental considerations proved to be the most important motives for the respondents to use BlaBlaCar. In turn, social relations that are established among the users of websites such as BlaBlaCar.pl are a kind of hybrid of relations developed in direct interaction during shared rides and those built up in cyberspace.
REFERENCES (70)
1.
Belk R. [2014], You Are What You Can Access: Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Online, Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1595–1600.
2.
Bell D. [1991], Modes of Exchange: Gift and Commodity, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 20(2): 155–167.
4.
Bonciu F., Bâlgăr A. [2016], Sharing Economy as a Contributor to Sustainable Growth. An EU Perspective, Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 16(2): 36–45.
5.
Botsman R., Rogers R. [2011], What’s Mine Is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live, Collins, London.
6.
Botsman R. [2016], The sharing economy lacks a shared definition, www.fastcoexist.com/3022028/the-sharing-economy-lacks-a-shared-definition [March 2, 2018].
8.
Böcker L., Meelen T. [2017], Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, June, 23: 28–39.
9.
Chambers-Schiller L. [1999], Singlehood, In: Stearns P.N. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Social History, Routledge, New York-London.
10.
Codagnone C., Martens B. [2016], Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues, Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/01 JRC100369, Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
11.
Cohen M.A. [2009], The Emergence of a Global Generation, The Futurist, 43(1): 57–59.
12.
Cohen B., Kietzmann J. [2014], Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy, Organization and Environment, 27(3): 279–296.
14.
Deml S. [2009], Singles also Thema in der Familiensoziologie Stellenwert, Probleme und unterschiedliche Facetten in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, Grin Verlag, München.
15.
Denning S. [2014], An economy of access is opening for business: five strategies for success, Strategy & Leadership, 42(4): 14–21.
16.
Dredge D., Gyimothy S. [2015], The Collaborative Economy and Tourism: Critical Perspectives, Questionable Claims and Silenced Voices, Tourism Recreation Research, 40(3): 286–302.
17.
Feelländer A., Ingram C., Teigland R. [2015], Sharing Economy – Embracing Change with Caution, Näringspolitiskt Forum Rapport #11, Örebro Universitet, Entreprenörskapsforum, Örebro.
18.
Ferguson E. [1997], The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990, Transportation, 24(4): 349–376.
20.
Gemius dla e-Commerce Polska [Gemius for e-Commerce Poland],
https://www.gemius.pl/ecommerc...- aktualnosci/ile-i-w-jaki-sposob-polacy-placa-zae- zakupy.html [February 2, 2019].
21.
Graeber D. [2011], Debt: The First 5000 Years, Melville House, New York. Hamari J., Sjöklint M., Ukkonen A. [2015], The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption, Journal of Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9),
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23... [May 15, 2018].
22.
Hertel J., Schütz A., DePaulo B.M., Morris W.L., Stucke T.S. [2007], She’s single, so what? How are singles perceived compared to people who are married?, Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 19(2): 139–158.
23.
Hillis M. [1936], Live Alone and Like It. The Classic Guide for the Single Woman, Viargo, London.
24.
Iannacci F. [2002], The economics of open-source networks, Communications & Strategies, 48(4): 119–138.
25.
Komisja Europejska [2016], Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów: Europejski program na rzecz gospodarki współdzielenia, COM (2016) 356 final, Brussels.
26.
Koopman C., Mitchell M., Thierer A. [2015], The sharing economy and consumer protection regulation: The case for policy change, The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship the Law, 8(2): 528–546.
27.
Koźlak A., Pawłowska B. [2017], Transport efektywnie korzystający z zasobów jako paradygmat współczesnego rozwoju sektora, Zeszyty Naukowe Ekonomika Transportu i Logistyka, 64: 111–128.
28.
Leibovitz L. [2015], The companies we keep: social networks, customer service, and the coming corporate challenges, In: Einav G. (ed.), The New World of Transitioned Media. Digital Realignment and Industry Transformation, Springer International Publishing, Cham.
29.
Levine D.N. [1995], Visions of the Sociological Tradition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30.
Martin C.J. [2016], The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?, Ecological Economics, 121: 149–159.
31.
Menor-Campos A., Baños García-Moreno M., López-Guzmán T., Hidalgo-Fernández A. [2019], Effects of Collaborative Economy: A Reflection, Social Sciences, May, 8(142): 1–13.
32.
Morawski W. [2003], Kronika kryzysów gospodarczych, Wydawnictwo Trio, Warsaw.
33.
Owyang J. [2015], The Collaborative Economy Defined, www.web-strategist.com/blog/2015/08/27/the-collaborative-economy-defined/ [March 7, 2016].
34.
Palos-Sanchez P.R., Correia M.B. [2018], The collaborative economy based analysis of demand: Study of Airbnb case in Spain and Portugal, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(3): 85–98.
35.
Petrella R. [1998], Technological innovation and welfare, Concepts and Transformation, 3(3): 283–298.
40.
Richardson L. [2015], Performing the sharing economy, Geoforum, 67: 121–129.
41.
Rifkin J. [2001], The Age of Access, The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where All of Life Is a Paid-For Experience, Penguin Putnam, New York.
42.
Rifkin J. [2014], The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
43.
Rosenmayr L., Kolland, F. [1997], Mein “Sinn” ist nicht dein “Sinn”. Verbindlichkeit oder Vielfalt – Mehrere Wege im Singletum, In: Beck U. (ed.), Kinder der Freiheit. Auflage III, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
44.
Rostek A., Zalega T. [2015], Konsumpcja kolaboratywna wśród polskich i amerykańskich konsumentów (część 1), Marketing i Rynek, 5: 11–19.
47.
Schor J.B., Craig J., Thompson E. [2014], Sustainable Lifestyles and the Quest for Plenitude. Case Studies of the New Economy, Yale University Press, Yale.
48.
Schor J.B., Fitzmaurice C.J. [2015], Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy, In: Reisch, L.A., Thogersen J. (ed.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
49.
Schor J.B., Walker E.T., Lee C.W., Parigi P., Cook K. [2015], On the sharing economy, Contexts, 14: 12–19.
50.
Signorelli A. [2017], Speculations on postcapitalism: how digitalization is disrupting everything we know about modern civilization, Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, Blue Harbor, Saint Paul.
51.
Sinclair M. [2016], Fair and Efficient Regulation of the Sharing Economy, Economic Affairs, 36(2): 204–211.
53.
Stein P.J. [1976], Single, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
54.
Stein P.J. [1981], Single Live: Unmarried Adults in Social Context, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
55.
Strähle J., Erhardt, C. [2017], Collaborative consumption 2.0: an alternative to fast fashion consumption, In: Strähle J. (ed.), Green Fashion Retail, Springer Series in Fashion Business, Singapore.
56.
Sundararajan A. [2014], Peer-to-peer Businesses and the Sharing (Collaborative) Economy: Overview, Economic Effects and Regulatory Issue,
http://smallbusiness.house. gov/uploadedfiles/1–15-2014_revised_sundararajan_testimony.pdf [May 8, 2017].
57.
Sundararajan A. [2016], Sharing Is Contagious: An Infographic on the Rise of Collaborative Consumption, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
58.
Tapscott D., Williams A.D. [2007], Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, Penguin, New York.
59.
Tönnies F. [1988], Wspólnota i stowarzyszenie, PWN, Warsaw.
60.
Urry J. [2008], Climate change, travel and complex futures, British Journal of Sociology, 59: 261–279.
61.
Wardak P., Zalega, T. [2013], Konsumpcja kolaboratywna jako nowy trend konsumencki, Studia i Materiały, 16(1): 7–32.
62.
Watters E. [2003], Urban Tribes: A Generation Redefines Friendship, Family, and Commitment, Bloomsbury, New York–London.
63.
Williams K.C., Page R.A. [2011], Marketing to the generations, Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3(3): 1–17.
64.
Wójcik D. [2017], Gospodarka współdzielenia a gospodarka doznań w sektorze turystycznym, In: Lachiewicz S., Zakrzewska-Bielawska A. (ed.), Organizacja w sieci relacji, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź.
65.
Vaughan R., Daverio R. [2018], Assessing the size and presence of the collaborative economy in Europe, file:///C:/Users/Artur/Downloads/Analytical%20paper%20on%20the%20economic%20scale%20and%20growth%20of%20the%20collaborative%20economy.pdf [November 10, 2018].
66.
Zalega T. [2019], Consumer Behaviour of Young Polish Singles – Selected Issues, Marketing i Rynek, 4: 3–14.
67.
Zgiep Ł. [2014], Sharing economy jako ekonomia przyszłości, Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna, 4(47): 193–205.
68.
www.techopedia.com/ definition/25777/peer-to-peer-network-p2p-network [27.03.2018].