Current Issue
Past Issues
About the Journal
Aims and Scope
Publisher
Editorial Board
Publishing Ethics
Indexing and Archiving
Copyright, Licensing and Access
For Authors
Submission Guidelines
Publication Fees
Peer-review Process
Editorial and Production Processes
Corrections and Retractions
Publishing Ethics
Copyright, Licensing and Access
Contact Us
RESEARCH PAPER
Trade Specialisation in Products Embedding Automation Technologies: Cross-Country Evidence and the Case of Poland
1
Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology, Poland
Submission date: 2024-11-19
Final revision date: 2025-03-27
Acceptance date: 2025-04-01
Publication date: 2025-09-30
Corresponding author
GNPJE 2025;(GNPJE Special Issue on Economic Impacts of Generative AI 3):47-67
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
Using a large sample of 160 economies observed over three decades since the mid-1990s, this paper documents patterns of trade specialisation in products embedding automation technologies. We draw on HS 6‑digit trade data matched with product-level taxonomies identifying automation-related export lines to quantify the importance of such products in national export structures. Despite the rising value of global trade in automation products, their share in total exports remains small—negligible in low-income economies and not exceeding 2.5% in high-income countries. Between 1995 and 2019, Poland experienced a rise in automation-related exports, in terms of both value and as a share of total exports (reaching 2.5% in 2019). Export specialisation in products embedding automation technologies, measured by the revealed comparative advantage index, is positively correlated with income per worker. However, automation-related exports have not played a significant role in economic convergence. By contrast, technological trade in the broad sense is among factors driving global productivity convergence. The paper also discusses the limitations of trade data in capturing international trends in automation technology.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Zuzanna Helena Zarach provided excellent research assistance.
FUNDING
This publication was financed by National Science Centre, Poland, OPUS grant no. 2020/37/B/HS4/01302.
REFERENCES (81)
1.
Acemoglu D. [2008], Introduction to modern economic growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2.
Acemoglu D. [2025], The simple macroeconomics of AI, Economic Policy, 40 (121): 13–58.
3.
Acemoglu D., Autor D. [2011], Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings, in: Handbook of Labor Economics: 1043–1171, Elsevier.
4.
Acemoglu D., Autor D., Dorn D., Hanson G. H., Price B. [2014], Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing, American Economic Review, 104 (5): 394–399.
5.
Acemoglu D., Lelarge C., Restrepo P. [2020], Competing with robots: Firm-level evidence from France, AEA papers and proceedings, 110: 383–388.
6.
Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. [2018], The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment, American Economic Review, 108 (6): 1488–1542.
7.
Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. [2019], Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (2): 3–30.
8.
Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. [2022], Demographics and automation, The Review of Economic Studies, 89 (1): 1–44.
9.
Anderson J. E., Yotov Y. V. [2010], The changing incidence of geography, American Economic Review, 100 (5): 2157–2186.
10.
Archibugi D., Coco A. [2005], Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice, Research Policy, 34 (2): 175–194.
11.
Archibugi D., Denni M., Filippetti A. [2009], The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (7): 917–931.
12.
Arendt L., Gałecka-Burdziak E., Núñez F., Pater R., Usabiaga C. [2023], Skills requirements across task-content groups in Poland: What online job offers tell us, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187: 122245.
13.
Atalay E., Phongthiengtham P., Sotelo S., Tannenbaum D. [2018], New technologies and the labor market, Journal of Monetary Economics, 97: 48–67.
14.
Autor D. [2003], Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing, Journal of Labor Economics, 21 (1): 1–41.
15.
Bahar D., Choudhury P., Rapoport H. [2020] Migrant inventors and the technological advantage of nations, Research Policy, 49 (9): 103947.
16.
Balassa B. [1965], Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage, The Manchester School, 33 (2): 99–123.
17.
Balland P. A., Broekel T., Diodato D., Giuliani E., Hausmann R., O’Clery N., Rigby D. [2022], Reprint of the new paradigm of economic complexity, Research Policy, 51 (8): 104568.
18.
Ballestar M. T., Díaz-Chao Á., Sainz J., Torrent-Sellens J. [2020], Knowledge, robots and productivity in SMEs: Explaining the second digital wave, Journal of Business Research, 108: 119–131.
19.
Bontadini F., Corrado C., Haskel J., Iommi M., Jona Lasinio C. S., Miyagawa T. [2024], Intangible Capital, TFP Growth and Green Shoots in New Productivity Data, International Productivity Monitor, 46: 3–37.
20.
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. [2011], Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy, Digital Frontier Press, Lexington.
21.
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. [2014], The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, WW Norton & Company, New York.
22.
Brynjolfsson E., Mitchell T., Rock D. [2018], What can machines learn, and what does it mean for occupations and the economy?, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108: 43–47.
23.
Brynjolfsson E., Rock D., Syverson C. [2019], Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox, The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, 23: 23–57.
24.
Cadot O., Carrère C., Strauss-Kahn V. [2011], Export diversification: what’s behind the hump?, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (2): 590–605.
25.
Cadot O., Carrère C., Strauss-Kahn V. [2013], Trade diversification, income, and growth: what do we know?, Journal of Economic Surveys, 27 (4): 790–812.
26.
Caliendo L., Parro F. [2015], Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA, The Review of Economic Studies, 82 (1): 1–44.
27.
Caselli F., Coleman W. J. [2001], Cross-Country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers, The American Economic Review, 91 (2): 328–335.
28.
Caselli F., Wilson D. J. [2004], Importing technology, Journal of Monetary Economics, 51 (1): 1–32.
29.
Castellani D., Lamperti F., Lavoratori K. [2022] Measuring adoption of industry 4.0 technologies via international trade data: insights from European countries, Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 49 (1): 51–93.
30.
Costinot A., Donaldson D., Komunjer I. [2012] What goods do countries trade? A quantitative exploration of Ricardo’s ideas, The Review of Economic Studies, 79 (2): 581–608.
31.
Cséfalvay Z. [2020], Robotization in Central and Eastern Europe: catching up or dependence?, European Planning Studies, 28 (8): 1534–1553.
32.
Dalum B., Laursen K., Villumsen G. [1998], Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: de-specialisation and ‘stickiness’, International Review of Applied Economics, 12 (3): 423–443.
33.
Domini G., Grazzi M., Moschella D., Treibich T. [2021], Threats and opportunities in the digital era: automation spikes and employment dynamics, Research Policy, 50 (7): 104–137.
34.
Draca M., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. [2007], Productivity and ICT: A Review of the Evidence, in: Mansell R., Avgerou, Ch., Quah, D., Silverstone R. (eds): 100–147, The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36.
Feenstra R. C., Inklaar R., Timmer M. P. [2015], The next generation of the Penn World Table, American Economic Review, 105 (10): 3150–82.
37.
Felipe J., Kumar U., Abdon A., Bacate M. [2012], Product complexity and economic development, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23 (1): 36–68.
38.
Foster-McGregor N., Nomaler Ö., Verspagen B. [2019], Measuring the creation and adoption of new technologies using trade and patent data, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT).
39.
French S. [2017], Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for?, Journal of International Economics, 106: 83–103.
40.
Gaulier G., Zignago S. [2010], BACI: International Trade Database at the Product-Level, The 1994–2007 Version CEPII, Working Paper, 2010–23.
41.
Gnidchenko A. A. [2021], Structural transformation and quality ladders: Evidence from the new Theil’s decomposition, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59: 281–291.
42.
Graetz G., Michaels G. [2018], Robots at work, Review of Economics and Statistics, 100 (5): 753–768.
43.
Growiec J. [2022], Automation, partial and full, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 26 (7): 1731–1755.
44.
Growiec J. [2023], Industry 4.0? Framing the Digital Revolution and Its Long-Run Growth Consequences, Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, 316 (4): 1–16.
45.
Hardy W., Keister R., Lewandowski P. [2016], Do entrants take it all? The evolution of task content of jobs in Poland, Ekonomia. Rynek, gospodarka, społeczeństwo, 47: 23–50.
46.
Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. [2009], The building blocks of economic complexity, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106 (26): 10570–10575.
47.
Hummels D., Ishii J., Yi K. M. [2001], The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade, Journal of International Economics, 54 (1): 75–96.
49.
Inklaar R., O’Mahony M., Timmer M. [2005], ICT and Europe’s productivity performance: industry-level growth account comparisons with the United States, Review of Income and Wealth, 51 (4): 505–536.
50.
Jabłońska J., Mućk J. [2024], Appetite for Destruction: A Firm-level Portrait of Automation in Poland, Working Paper No. 371, Narodowy Bank Polski.
51.
Jorgenson D. W., Ho M. S., Stiroh K. J. [2008], A retrospective look at the US productivity growth resurgence, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22 (1): 3–24.
52.
Koch M., Manuylov I., Smolka M. [2021], Robots and firms, The Economic Journal, 131 (638): 2553–2584.
53.
Kremer M., Willis J., You Y. [2022], Converging to convergence, NBER macroeconomics annual, 36 (1): 337–412.
54.
Kromann L., Malchow-Møller N., Skaksen J. R., Sørensen A. [2020], Automation and productivity—a cross-country, cross-industry comparison, Industrial and Corporate Change, 29 (2): 265–287.
55.
Laursen K. [2015], Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialisation, Eurasian Business Review, 5: 99–115.
56.
Levchenko A. A., Zhang J. [2016], The evolution of comparative advantage: Measurement and welfare implications, Journal of Monetary Economics, 78: 96–111.
57.
Lohmann A., Békés G., Hinz J. et al. [2024], Open Source Software Input Output Tables (OSSIO), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 10.22000/SaNahyIFpqpJVFbb.
58.
Maneschi A. [1998], Comparative advantage in international trade: A historical perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
59.
Müller Ch. [2023], World Robotics 2023 – Industrial Robots, IFR Statistical Department, VDMA Services GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, https://ifr.org/img/worldrobot....
60.
Oliner S. D., Sichel D. E., Stiroh K. J. [2008], Explaining a productive decade, Journal of policy Modeling, 30 (4): 633–673.
61.
Pahl S., Timmer M. P. [2019], Patterns of vertical specialisation in trade: long-run evidence for 91 countries, Review of World Economics, 155: 459–486.
62.
Parteka A. [2015], Dywersyfikacja Handlu Zagranicznego a Rozwój Gospodarczy (Trade Diversification and Economic Development), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
63.
Parteka A., Kordalska A. [2023], Artificial intelligence and productivity: global evidence from AI patent and bibliometric data, Technovation, 125: 102764.
64.
Parteka A., Zarach Z. H., Kordalska A. [2025], Technological content of export diversification–evolution along the economic growth process, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 74: 14–27.
65.
Pieri F., Vecchi M., Venturini F. [2018], Modelling the joint impact of R&D and ICT on productivity: A frontier analysis approach, Research Policy, 47 (9): 1842–1852.
66.
Prettner K., Bloom D. E. [2020], Automation and its macroeconomic consequences: Theory, evidence, and social impacts, Academic Press, Cambridge.
67.
Restrepo P. [2023], Automation: Theory, Evidence, and Outlook, Annual Review of Economics, 16.
68.
Sarin V., Mahapatra S. K., Sood N. [2022], Export diversification and economic growth: A review and future research agenda, Journal of Public Affairs, 22 (3): e2524.
69.
Schwab K. [2024], The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond, in: Handbook of research on strategic leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: 29–34, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
70.
Soete L. [1987], The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: the evidence reconsidered, Research Policy, 16 (2-4): 101–130.
71.
Timmer M. P., Miroudot S., Vries G. J. de [2019], Functional specialisation in trade, Journal of Economic Geography, 19 (1): 1–30.
72.
UNCTAD [2025], SITC rev.3 products, by technological categories, https://unctadstat.unctad.org/....
73.
Van Ark B., O’Mahony M., Timmer M. P. [2008], The productivity gap between Europe and the United States: trends and causes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22 (1): 25–44.
74.
Van Roy V., Vertesy D., Damioli G. [2020], AI and robotics innovation: 1–35, Springer International Publishing, London.
75.
Venturini F. [2022], Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 194: 220–243.
76.
Vollrath T. L. [1991], A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127 (2): 265–280.
77.
WIPO [2024a], Generative Artificial Intelligence. Patent Landscape Report, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.
78.
WIPO [2024b], Global Innovation Index 2024 Unlocking the Promise of Social Entrepreneurship, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.
79.
Yeats A. J. [1985], On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysis, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 121 (1): 61–73.
80.
Zarach Z. H., Parteka A. [2023], Export diversification and dependence on natural resources, Economic Modelling, 126: 106436.
81.
Zeira J. [1998], Workers, machines, and economic growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (4): 1091–1117.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2300-5238 |
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
