PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Labour Market Policies and Other Determinants of Employment Flexibility
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Statystyki i Demografii, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Polska
 
2
Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2021-10-23
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-12-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-04-13
 
 
Publication date: 2022-06-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Michał Taracha   

Instytut Statystyki i Demografii, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Polska
 
 
GNPJE 2022;310(2):88-104
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to examine the impact of active and passive labour market policies (ALMP and PLMP) on employment flexibility, measured as the number of life-course job changes by people aged 50 and over. Another goal is to obtain conclusions about the impact of the Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) index, the collective bargaining coverage rate, household income, and the number of years of education received; but also to identify the most important psychological factors influencing employment flexibility. The analysis was carried out using models of the categorical dependent variable, especially the zero-inflated negative binomial model, based on the data from the SHARE database for the EU, Israel and Switzerland. The respective negative and positive impacts of ALMP and PLMP on employment flexibility shows the particular importance of ALMP in striving to improve the functioning of the labour market. The juxtaposition of conclusions related to psychological traits indicated that the enthusiasm for work is crucial in determining life-course employment flexibility. The link between the dependent variable and household income was negative, and the impact of the EPL index and the collective bargaining coverage rate was positive. On the other hand, the relationship between the number of years of education and professional mobility was divergent, indicating the dependence of employment flexibility on the professional specialisation of respondents.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Aluja A. A., Garcıá Ó., Garcıá L. F. [2002], A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50‑bipolar adjectives, Personality and Individual Differences, 33(5): 713–725.
 
2.
Bachmann R., Bechara P., Vonnahme C. [2019], Occupational Mobility in Europe: Extent, Determinants and Consequences, IZA DP No. 12679, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn.
 
3.
Bernatchez J. [2010], La flexisécurité ou le modèle danois: pour sortir de la crise manufacturière, « Revue internationale sur le travail et la société», 8(2): 116–133.
 
4.
Boeri T., Galasso V., Conde-Ruiz J. [2012], The Political Economy Of Flexicurity, Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(4): 684–715.
 
5.
Caspar S., Hartwig I., Moench B. [2012], European Labor Market In Critical Times: The Importance Of Flexicurity Confirmed, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(1): 154–160.
 
6.
Cazes S., Nesporova A. [2003], Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) and its effects on Labour Market Performance, International Labour Office, Valletta.
 
7.
Declairieux B. [2018], La belle reprise de l’emploi des cadres, Capital, https://www.capital.fr/economi....
 
8.
Galí J. [2020], Insider-Outsider Labor Markets, Hysteresis And Monetary Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. 27385: 1–53.
 
9.
Góra M. [2011], Ekonomia niedoskonałych rynków pracy, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
 
10.
Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M. [2011], Kultury i organizacje: zaprogramowanie umysłu, PWE, Warszawa.
 
11.
Ingold J., Valizade D. [2015], Employer engagement in active labour market policies in the UK and Denmark: a survey of employers, University of Leeds, Leeds.
 
12.
Jadamus-Hacura M., Mielich-Iwanek K. [2015], Elastyczność współczesnych rynków pracy, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 220: 36–57.
 
13.
Komisja Europejska [2007], Komunikat Komisji Europejskiej do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno‑Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów: Wspólne zasady wdrażania modelu flexicurity, KOM (2007) 359 wersja ostateczna, Bruksela.
 
14.
Lashley C., Chaplain A. [1999], Labour turnover: Hidden problem – hidden cost, The Hospitality Review, 1(1): 49–54.
 
15.
Levinsky M., Litwin H. [2019], Personality traits: The Ten-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10), w: Bergmann M., Scherpenzeel A., Börsch-Supan A. (red.), Share Wave 7 Methodology: Panel innovations and life histories, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Monachium.
 
16.
Lind J. [2009], The End of the Ghent System as Trade Union Recruitment Machinery?, Industrial Relations Journal, 40(6): 510–523.
 
17.
Majewska M., Samol S. [2016], Rozwój elastycznego rynku pracy: uwarunkowania prawno-ekonomiczne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
 
18.
McKenzie I. [2010], English for Business Studies. A course for Business Studies and Economics students, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
19.
Melich-Iwanek K. [2009], Polski rynek pracy w świetle teorii histerezy, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 26(76): 122–132.
 
20.
Möhring K. [2015], Employment histories and pension incomes in Europe: a multilevel analysis of the role of institutional factors, European Societies, 17(1): 3–26.
 
21.
Monastiriotis V. [2007], Labour market flexibility in UK regions, 1979–1998, Area, 39(3): 310–322.
 
22.
OECD [1994], The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies, OECD.
 
23.
OECD [2011], Compendium of OECD Well-being Indicators, http://www.oecd.org/sdd/479172....
 
24.
Patibandla M. [2013], New Institutional Economics: Its Relevance to Curbing Corruption, Economic & Political Weekly, 48(9): 55–63.
 
25.
Rueda D. [2005], Insider-Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties, American Political Science Review, 99(1): 61–74.
 
26.
Sigeman T. [1999], Insiders and Outsiders in the Labour Market Experiences of a Nordic Welfare State in Labour Law Perspective, Scandinavian Studies in Law, 38: 264–278.
 
27.
Snower D., Lindbeck A. [2001], Insiders versus Outsiders, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1): 165–188.
 
28.
Szuwarzyński A. [2011], Flexicurity. Elastyczność i bezpieczeństwo, Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii Politechniki Gdańskiej, Gdańsk.
 
29.
Tridico P. [2015], From economic decline to the current crisis in Italy, International Review of Applied Economics, 29(2): 164–193.
 
30.
Voss E., Dornelas A., Wild A., Kwiatkiewicz A. [2011], Partenaires sociaux et flexicurité sur les marchés du travail contemporains, Commission européenne, Bruksela.
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top