PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Optimal Labour Income Taxation in Poland: The Case of High-Income Earners
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
 
2
Schools Complex in Bychawa, Poland
 
3
SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2022-03-06
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-09-12
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-01-04
 
 
Publication date: 2023-03-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Konrad Walczyk   

SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
 
 
GNPJE 2023;313(1):41-65
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
H21
H24
 
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we use actual data provided by the Polish tax authority and characterise the properties of income distribution in Poland in the case of high-income earners. By employing a variety of techniques we are able to confirm that the distribution of income in Poland can be approximated with a Pareto distribution in its upper tail. This finding makes the formula for the optimal marginal tax rates of Saez [2001] applicable to the Polish case and allows us to provide estimates of the optimal marginal tax rates for Poland. We show that the current tax policy in Poland is not optimal. Specifically, we show, by relying on empirically viable estimates of the elasticity of the labour supply with respect to the wage, that the optimal marginal tax rate at high income levels exceeds 60%. In other words, we suggest that there is room for a welfare-improving reform in Poland, and we argue that high-income individuals should be expected to contribute substantially more at the margin than they currently do.
FUNDING
The results presented in this paper were obtained as a part of a research project generously funded by Poland’s National Science Center: Grant #UMO-2016/21/B/HS4/03055. We would like to express our deepest gratitude to the National Science Center for its funding, which made the completion of our research on optimal labour income taxation possible.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Atkinson A., Piketty T., Saez E. [2011], Top Incomes in the Long-Run of History, Journal of Economic Literature, 49 (1): 3–71.
 
2.
Bargain O., Orsini Ch, Peichl A. [2014], Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the USA, Journal of Human Resources, 49 (3): 723–838.
 
3.
Berg A., Ostry J. D., Tsangarides Ch. G. [2014], Redistribution Inequality and Growth, IMF Discussion Papers.
 
4.
Chrostek P., Klejdysz J., Korniluk D., Skawiński M. [2019], Wybrane aspekty systemu podatkowo-składkowego na podstawie danych PIT i ZUS 2016, MF Opracowania i Analizy, Ministerstwo Finansów, Warszawa.
 
5.
Diamond P. [1998], Optimal Income Taxation: An Example with a U-Shaped Pattern for the Optimal Marginal Rates, American Economic Review, 88: 83–95.
 
6.
Diamond P., Saez E. [2011], The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (4): 165–190.
 
7.
Doligalski P. [2019], Gdzie jest szczyt krzywej Laffera dla najwyższych dochodów w Polsce, Dobrobyt na Pokolenia, Raport naukowy.
 
8.
Dudek M. K. [2013], On Efficient Taxation, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=22666... or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn....
 
9.
Dudek M. K. [2016], Probabilistic Lump-Sum Taxation, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2601... or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn....
 
10.
Dudek M. K., Dudek P., Walczyk K. [2020], Practical Solutions to the Problem of Mirrlees – Optimal Labor Income Taxation in Poland, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3621....
 
11.
Dudek M. K., Dudek P., Walczyk K. [2021], Optimal Labor Income Taxation in Poland, Wydawnictwo AFiB Vistula, Warszawa.
 
12.
Ebert U. [1992], A Reexamination of the Optimal Nonlinear Income Tax, Journal of Public Economics, 49: 47–73.
 
13.
Guu S. M., Judd K. [1997], Asymptotic methods for aggregate growth models, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21 (6): 1025–1042.
 
14.
Kaplow L. [2010] Concavity of Utility, Concavity of Welfare, and Redistribution of Income, International Tax and Public Finance, 17: 25–42.
 
15.
Kleven H., Landais C., Saez E. [2013], Taxation and International Mobility of Superstars: Evidence from the European Football Market, American Economic Review, 103 (5): 1892–1924.
 
16.
Kopczuk W. [2005], Tax Bases, Tax Rates and the Elasticity of Reported Income, Journal of Public Economics, 89 (11–12): 2093–2119.
 
17.
Kopczuk W. [2012], The Polish business ’flat’ tax and its effect on reported incomes: a Pareto improving reform, Columbia University Working Paper.
 
18.
Kydland F., Prescott E. [1982], Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations, Econometrica, 50: 1345–1371.
 
19.
Lollivier S., Rochet J. Ch. [1983], Bunching and Second Order Conditions: A Note on Optimal Tax Theory, Journal of Economic Theory, 31: 392–400.
 
20.
Mankiw N. G. [2013], Defending the One Percent, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (3): 21–34.
 
21.
Mirrlees J. A. [1971], An Exploration in the Theory of Optimal Income Taxation, Review of Economic Studies, 38: 175–208.
 
22.
Myck M. [2017], Modelling Labour Supply in Poland: Elasticity Estimates and Policy Simulations, IBS Seminar.
 
23.
Myck M., Trzciński K. [2019], From Partial to Full Universality: The Family 500+ Programme in Poland and its Labor Supply Implications, ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, 17 (03): 36–44.
 
24.
OECD [2011a], The Taxation of Low-Income Workers, Chapter 2 in OECD Tax Policy Study No. 21: Taxation and Employment, OECD, Paris.
 
25.
OECD [2011b], The Taxation of Mobile High-Skilled Workers, Chapter 4 in OECD Tax Policy Study No. 21: Taxation and Employ¬ment, OECD, Paris.
 
26.
Piketty T. [2014], Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Harvard University Press.
 
27.
Piketty T., Saez E., Stantcheva S. [2014], Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6 (1): 230–271.
 
28.
Revesz J. T. [1989], The Optimal Taxation of Labour Income, Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 3: 453–475.
 
29.
Ruiz del Portal X. [2007], The Problem of Optimum Income Taxation: A Remark on Its Monotonicity Constraint, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9: 265–283.
 
30.
Ruiz del Portal X. [2008], Is the Optimal Income Tax Regressive?, Economics Letters, 100: 402–404.
 
31.
Ruiz del Portal X. [2010], On the Qualitative Properties of the Optimal Income Tax, Mathematical Social Sciences, 59: 288–298.
 
32.
Sadka E. [1976], On Income Distribution, Incentive Effects and Optimal Income Taxation, Review of Economic Studies, 43 (1): 261–268.
 
33.
Saez E. [1999], A Characterization of the Income Tax Schedule Minimizing Deadweight Burden, MIT Ph.D. thesis (chapter 3).
 
34.
Saez E. [2001], Using Elasticities to Derive Optimal Income Tax Rates, Review of Economic Studies, 68: 205–229.
 
35.
Saez E., Stantcheva S. [2013], Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights for Optimal Tax Theory, American Economic Review, 106 (1): 219–246.
 
36.
Seade J. K. [1977], On the Shape of Optimal Tax Schedules, Journal of Public Economics, 7 (1): 203–236.
 
37.
Sen A. K. [1973], On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
 
38.
Tuomala M. [1990], Optimal Income Tax and Redistribution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
 
39.
Tuomala M. [2010], On Optimal Non-linear Income Taxation: Numerical Results Revisited, International Tax and Public Finance, 17: 259–270.
 
40.
Zawisza T. [2019], Optimal Taxation of Employment and Self-Employment: Evidence from Poland and Implications, IFS Working Paper.
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top