PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Equalisation Grants and Local Taxation: The Case of Poland
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Public Finance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2023-01-04
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-04-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-05-12
 
 
Publication date: 2023-06-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Monika Banaszewska   

Department of Public Finance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
 
 
GNPJE 2023;314(2):47-65
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
H71
H77
 
ABSTRACT
This paper uses data on real estate tax revenue obtained by Polish municipalities from 2005 to 2017 to determine whether equalisation grants discourage local governments from collecting their own revenue. This question lies at the heart of efforts to build revenue equalisation systems for local government units. A discontinuous change in the transfer scheme makes it possible to employ a quasi-experimental approach (difference-in-differences estimation). An increase in the vertical equalisation rate is found to diminish the tax effort of municipalities that receive equalisation grants. The income effect of these grants is also documented. The research results indicate that shifts in an institutional setting trigger permanent changes in local fiscal policies. Moreover, it has been found that the effect increases after a few years and remains significant in the medium term. This implies that any modifications in the sub-national fiscal framework should be preceded by thorough analysis and consultations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author gratefully acknowledges the support received from Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD).
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Bailey S. J., Connolly S. [1998], The flypaper effect: Identifying areas for further research, Public Choice, 95 (3–4): 335–361.
 
2.
Banaszewska M. [2022a], Dochody własne w systemie finansowania gmin. Determinanty i implikacje, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań, https://doi.org/10.18559/978-8....
 
3.
Banaszewska M. [2022b], Preferential tax treatment – a political or economic tool?, Regional Studies, 56 (8): 1377–1390.
 
4.
Baretti C., Huber B., Lichtblau K. [2002], A tax on tax revenue: The incentive effects of equalizing transfers: Evidence from Germany, International Tax and Public Finance, 9 (6): 631–649.
 
5.
Baskaran T. [2012], The flypaper effect: evidence from a natural experiment in Hesse, MPRA Paper No. 37144.
 
6.
Besley T., Case A. [1995], Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3): 769–798.
 
7.
Bird R. M., Smart M. [2002], Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries, World Development, 30 (6): 899–912.
 
8.
Bischoff I., Krabel S. [2017], Local taxes and political influence: Evidence from locally dominant firms in German municipalities, International Tax and Public Finance, 24 (2): 313–337.
 
9.
Blöchliger H., Nettley M. [2015], Sub-central Tax Autonomy: 2011 Update, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism No. 20.
 
10.
Boadway R. [2004], The theory and practice of equalization, CESifo Economic Studies, 50 (1): 211–254.
 
11.
Boadway R. [2006], Intergovernmental redistributive transfers: efficiency and equity, in: Ahmad E., Brosio G. (eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism: 355–380, Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
 
12.
Bucovetsky S., Smart M. [2006], The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8 (1): 119–144.
 
13.
Buettner T. [2006], The incentive effect of fiscal equalization transfers on tax policy, Journal of Public Economics, 90 (3): 477–497.
 
14.
Bukowska G., Siwińska-Gorzelak J. [2018], Can higher tax autonomy enhance local fiscal discipline? Evidence from tax decentralization in Poland, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49 (2): 299–324.
 
15.
Caldeira E., Rota-Graziosi G. [2014], The crowding-in effect of simple unconditional central grants on local own-source revenue: The case of Benin, Journal of African Economies, 23 (3): 361–387.
 
16.
Dahlberg M., Mörk E., Rattsø J., Ågren H. [2008], Using a discontinuous grant rule to identify the effect of grants on local taxes and spending, Journal of Public Economics, 92 (12): 2320–2335.
 
17.
Dahlby B., Warren N. [2003], Fiscal incentive effects of the Australian equalisation system, Economic Record, 79 (247): 434–445.
 
18.
Dexia [2011/2012], EU Subnational Governments. 2010 Key Figures, http://www.ccre.org/docs/Nuanc... (accessed on 12.12.2022).
 
19.
Dziemianowicz R., Wyszkowski A. [2012], Preferencje w podatkach lokalnych i ich wpływ na dochody JST, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H, Oeconomia, 46 (3): 165–174.
 
20.
Egger P., Koethenbuerger M., Smart M. [2010], Do fiscal transfers alleviate business tax competition? Evidence from Germany, Journal of Public Economics, 94 (3–4): 235–246.
 
21.
Esteller-Moré A., Solé-Ollé A. [2002], Tax setting in a federal system: The case of personal income taxation in Canada, International Tax and Public Finance, 9 (3): 235–257.
 
22.
Ferede E. [2017], The incentive effects of equalization grants on tax policy: Evidence from Canadian provinces, Public Finance Review, 45 (6): 723–747.
 
23.
Galiński P. [2014], Significance of tax expenditures for budgets of local governments: the case of Poland, Economic Alternatives, 3: 56–70.
 
24.
Gordon N. [2004], Do federal grants boost school spending? Evidence from Title I, Journal of Public Economics, 88 (9–10): 1771–1792.
 
25.
Hines J. R., Thaler R. H. [1995], The flypaper effect, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4): 217–226.
 
26.
Holm-Hadulla F. [2018], Fiscal equalization and the tax structure, European Central Bank Working Paper Series No. 2203.
 
27.
Inman R. P. [2008], The flypaper effect, NBER Working Paper No. 14579.
 
28.
Jia J., Ding S., Liu Y. [2020], Decentralization, incentives, and local tax enforcement, Journal of Urban Economics, 115, online first.
 
29.
Knight B. [2002], Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: Theory and evidence from the federal highway aid program, American Economic Review, 92 (1): 71–92.
 
30.
Köthenbürger M. [2002], Tax competition and fiscal equalization, International Tax and Public Finance, 9 (4): 391–408.
 
31.
Kotsogiannis C., Schwager R. [2008], Accountability and fiscal equalization, Journal of Public Economics, 92 (12): 2336–2349.
 
32.
Liu Y., Zhao J. [2011], Intergovernmental fiscal transfers and local tax efforts: evidence from provinces in China, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 14 (4): 295–300.
 
33.
Masaki T. [2018], The impact of intergovernmental transfers on local revenue generation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Tanzania, World Development, 106: 173–186.
 
34.
Miyazaki T. [2016], Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers and Tax Efforts: Evidence from Japan, MPRA Paper No. 74337, University Library of Munich, Germany.
 
35.
OECD [2010], Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries, Paris, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org.0... (accessed on 20.04.2017).
 
36.
Pisauro M. G. [2001], Intergovernmental Relations and Fiscal Discipline: Between Common Tax Resources and Soft Budget Constraints, International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 1–65.
 
37.
Rodden J. A., Rodden J., Eskeland G. S., Litvack J. I. (eds.) [2003], Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints, MIT Press, Cambridge.
 
38.
Rodríguez J. B. [2013], The Incentive Effect of Equalization Grants on Tax Collection, The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13 (1): 173–202.
 
39.
Shishkin D. [2018], The incentive effects of the Minnesota Fiscal Disparities Program on tax policy in Minnesota, Journal of Applied Business & Economics, 20 (4): 155–165.
 
40.
Siwińska-Gorzelak J., Bukowska G., Wójcik P. [2019], The impact of revenue autonomy on the composition of local public spending: evidence from Poland, Local Government Studies, 1–25.
 
41.
Smart M. [1998], Taxation and deadweight loss in a system of intergovernmental transfers, Canadian Journal of Economics, 31 (1): 189–206.
 
42.
Smart M. [2007], Raising taxes through equalization, Canadian Journal of Economics, 40 (4): 1188–1212.
 
43.
Spahn P. B. [2006], Equity and Efficiency Aspects of Interagency Transfers in a Multigovernment Framework, in: Shah A., Boadway R. (eds.), Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: principles and practice: 75–106, The World Bank, Washington, D. C.
 
44.
Swianiewicz P. [2016], The politics of local tax policy-making in Poland, NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Politics, 9 (1): 167–189, https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-....
 
45.
Swianiewicz P., Łukomska J. [2015], Polityka podatkowa władz lokalnych w Polsce, Municipium S. A., Warszawa.
 
46.
Wildasin D. E. [1988], Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition, Journal of Public Economics, 35 (2): 229–240.
 
47.
Wójcik P. [2018], Metody pomiaru realnej konwergencji gospodarczej w ujęciu regionalnym i lokalnym. Konwergencja równoległa, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
 
48.
Zárate Marco A., Vallés Giménez J. [2018], Regional tax effort in Spain, Economics Discussion Papers No. 2018–79.
 
49.
Zodrow G. R., Mieszkowski P. [1986], Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods, in: G. Zodrow (ed.), Taxation in theory and practice: Selected essays of George R. Zodrow: 525–542, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore.
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top