PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Effectiveness of Carbon Pricing Policy: An Empirical Analysis
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Graduate Studies, Department of Economics, Yalova University, Türkiye
 
2
Faculty of Business and Administrative Sciences, Okan University, Türkiye
 
3
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Yalova University, Türkiye
 
 
Submission date: 2024-11-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-01-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-02-17
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Eyüp Tanıl   

Institute of Graduate Studies, Department of Economics, Yalova University, Türkiye Faculty of Business and Administrative Sciences, Okan University, Türkiye
 
 
GNPJE 2025;324(4):30-44
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
Carbon taxation has emerged as an effective policy tool for combating global climate change. This study investigates the impact of carbon pricing on carbon emissions and the carbon footprint (CF) in selected countries that were among the first to adopt carbon taxation, using panel data from 1992 to 2021. We apply a range of econometric methods to address specific data challenges, including cross-section dependence tests to explore interdependencies among countries; Delta homogeneity tests to check whether variables are homogeneous across the panel; second-generation panel unit root tests (robust against cross-section dependence) to assess the stationarity of variables; and the Gegenbach et al. [2016] panel cointegration test (robust to both cross-section dependence and heterogeneity) to identify long-term relationships. We also use the panel Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares Mean Group (DOLSMG) estimator to estimate long-run coefficients, considering both heterogeneity across the panel and cross-section dependence. Finally, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin [2012] panel causality test —which also accounts for heterogeneity and cross-section dependence — is employed to examine causal relationships. The results indicate that carbon pricing effectively reduces both carbon emissions and CF. Moreover, the findings reveal a cointegrating relationship among the variables, as well as a unidirectional causal relationship from carbon pricing to both carbon emissions and CF.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., Hemous D. [2012], The environment and directed technical change, American Economic Review, 102 (1): 131–166.
 
2.
Acemoglu D., Akcigit U., Hanley D., Kerr W. [2016], Transition to clean technology, Journal of Political Economy, 124 (1): 52–104.
 
3.
Akkaya Ş., Hepsag A. [2021], Does fuel tax decrease carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey? Evidence from an asymmetric nonlinear cointegration test and error correction model, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 35094–35101, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
4.
Bayer P., Aklin M. [2020], The European Union emissions trading system reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (16): 8804–8812, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1....
 
5.
Breusch T. S., Pagan A. R. [1980], The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics, Review of Economic Studies, 47 (1): 239–253, https://doi.org/10.2307/229711....
 
6.
Destek M. A., Ulucak R., Dogan E. [2018], Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25: 29387–29396, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
7.
Dogan B., Chu L. K., Ghosh S., Truong H. D., Balsalobre-Lorente D. [2022], How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies? Renewable Energy, 187: 645–656, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
 
8.
Dumitrescu E. I., Hurlin C. [2012], Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels, Economic Modelling, 29 (4): 1450–1460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ....
 
9.
Fernando S. [2019], The environmental effectiveness of carbon taxes: a case study of the Nordic experience: 349–368, The 1st International Research Conference on Carbon Pricing, 14–15 February 2019, New Delhi India, World Bank.
 
10.
Friedlingstein P., O’sullivan M., Jones M. W., Andrew R. M., Gregor L., Hauck J.,… Zheng B. [2022], Global carbon budget 2022, Earth System Science Data, 14 (11): 4811–4900.
 
11.
Gengenbach C., Urbain J., Westerlund J. [2016], Error Correction Testing in Panels with Common Stochastic Trends, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31: 982–1004, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.24....
 
12.
Global Footprint Network [2022], Country trends, https://data.footprintnetwork.... [accessed 10.05.2023].
 
13.
Gugler K., Haxhimusa A., Liebensteiner M. [2023], Carbon pricing and emissions: Causal effects of Britain’s carbon tax, Energy Economics, 121: 106655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
14.
Hájek M., Zimmermannová J., Helman K., Rozenský L. [2019], Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries, Energy Policy, 134: 110955, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
15.
Hsiao C. [2014], Analysis of the Panel Data, Cambridge University Press, New York.
 
16.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [2021], Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. May¬cock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, B. Zhou, (eds.), Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/978100....
 
17.
International Energy Agency [2023], CO2 emissions in 2022, https://www.iea.org/reports/co....
 
18.
Köppl A., Schratzenstaller M. [2022], Carbon taxation: A review of the empirical literature, Journal of Economic Surveys, https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.1....
 
19.
Kotnik Ž., Klun M., Škulj D. [2014], The Effect of Taxation on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 10 (43): 168–185.
 
20.
Lilliestam J., Patt A., Bersalli G. [2021], The effect of carbon pricing on technological change for full energy decarbonization: A review of empirical ex-post evidence, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 12 (1): e681, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.68....
 
21.
Lin B., Li X. [2011], The effect of carbon tax on per capita C02 emissions, Energy Policy, 39 (9): 5137–5146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
22.
Loganathan N., Shahbaz M., Taha R. [2014], The link between green taxation and economic growth on CO2 emissions: fresh evi¬dence from Malaysia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 1083–1091, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rs....
 
23.
Lopez L., Weber S. [2017], Testing for Granger causality in panel data, The Stata Journal, 17 (4): 972–984.
 
24.
Mehta D., Derbeneva V. [2024]), Impact of environmental fiscal reforms on carbon emissions of Euro-4 countries: CS-NARDL approach, International Journal of Thermofluids, 21: 100550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft....
 
25.
Meireles M., Robaina M., Magueta D. [2021], The effectiveness of environmental taxes in reducing CO2 emissions in passen¬ger vehicles: The case of Mediterranean countries, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (10): 5442, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
26.
Metcalf G. E. [2019], On the economics of a carbon tax for the United States, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 405–484.
 
27.
Miller S., Vela M. [2013], Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?, IDB Working Paper No. 467, https://www.cbd.int/financial/..., [accessed 20.05.2023].
 
28.
Morley B. [2012], Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Environmental Taxes, Applied Economics Letters, 19 (18): 1817– 1820, https://doi.org/10.1080/135048....
 
29.
Munich Re [2025], Natural disasters 2024: Climate change is showing its claws, https://www.munichre.com/en/co....
 
30.
Pedroni P. [2001], Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (4): 727–731.
 
31.
Pesaran M. H. [2004], General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229.
 
32.
Pesaran M. H. [2007], A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (2): 265–312.
 
33.
Pesaran M. H., Smith R. [1995], Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 68: 79–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4....
 
34.
Pesaran M. H., Ullah A., Yamagata T. [2008], A Bias Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross Section İndependence, The Econometrics Journal, 11 (1): 105–127, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368....
 
35.
Pesaran M. H., Yamagata T. [2008], Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels, Journal of Econometrics, 142 (1): 50–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeco....
 
36.
Rafique M. Z., Fareed Z., Ferraz D., Ikram M., Huang S. [2022], Exploring the heterogenous impacts of environmental taxes on environmental footprints: an empirical assessment from developed economies, Energy, 238: 121753, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
37.
Safi A., Chen Y., Wahab S., Zheng L., Rjoub H. [2021], Does environmental taxes achieve the carbon neutrality target of G7 economies? Evaluating the importance of environmental R&D, Journal of Environmental Management, 293: 112908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
38.
Saucedo A., Edgar J., Diaz P., Del Pilar Parra O. M. [2017], Estimating Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Impact of Environmental Taxes and Energy Consumption in Co2 Emissions of OECD Countries, Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 3 (1): 901–912.
 
39.
Shmelev E. S., Speck S. U. [2018], Green fiscal reform in Sweden: Econometric assessment of the carbon and energy taxation scheme, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90: 969–981, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
40.
Smith K. R., Woodward A., Campbell-Lendrum D., Chadee D. D., Honda Y., Liu Q., Haines A. [2014]), Climate change and health: on the latest IPCC report, The Lancet, 383 (9924): 1185–1189.
 
41.
Stiglitz J. E., Stern N., Duan M., Edenhofer O., Giraud G., Heal G. M., Winkler H. [2017], Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices, https://doi.org/10.7916/d8 w2nc-4103.
 
42.
Telatar O. M., Birinci N. [2022]), The effects of environmental tax on ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions: A non¬linear cointegration analysis on Turkey, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (29): 44335–44347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
43.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [1998], Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/resource/do....
 
44.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [2015], Paris Agreement, https://unfccc.int/process-and... [accessed 17.05.2023].
 
45.
Wolde-Rufael Y., Mulat-Weldemeskel E. [2022], The moderating role of environmental tax and renewable energy in CO2 emissions in Latin America and Caribbean countries: evidence from method of moments quantile regression, Environmental Challenges, 6: 100412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc....
 
46.
World Bank [2022], State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022, World Bank, http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37... [accessed 25.05.2023].
 
47.
World Bank [2023], Carbon pricing dashboard, https://carbonpricingdashboard... [accessed 29.05.2023].
 
48.
Xie P., Jamaani F. [2022], Does green innovation, energy productivity and environmental taxes limit carbon emissions in devel¬oped economics: Implications for sustainable development, Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, 63: 66–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stru....
 
49.
Zaghdoudi T., Maktouf S. [2017], Threshold Effect in the Relationship Between Environmental Taxes and CO2 Emissions: a PSTR Specification, Economics Bulletin, 37 (3): 2086–2094.
 
50.
Zhang W., Li J., Li G., Guo S. [2020], Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China, Energy, 196: 117117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
 
eISSN:2300-5238
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top